Check My Relativity Video for an Engineer | Answer His Question on Light's Speed

  • Thread starter Thread starter zimbabwe
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relativity Video
zimbabwe
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
I made a relativity video for my father as he's been asking a long time.

His question is basically how can light always travel at the same speed no matter where you are. So to answer it and since he's far away I made this video



If someone could check it and let me know if it's wrong or any points are unclear before I send it to him. He worked as an engineer so the maths should be OK.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
It seems accurate to me. But I don't think you've achieved an explanation of why every observer sees light traveling at the same speed. You've demonstrated via the transverse light clock that time dilation happens.

One reason ( rather than an explanation ) is that Maxwell's equations tell us that the speed of light is a function of two universal constants ( scalars) which are naturally Lorentz invariant.
 
One reason ( rather than an explanation ) is that Maxwell's equations tell us that the speed of light is a function of two universal constants ( scalars) which are naturally Lorentz invariant.
Nothing could illustrate better than this, the harm done by teaching SI units. The speed of light is not "a function of two universal constants". Look up 'Gaussian units' on Wikipedia, and read how ε0 and μ0 are not in any way fundamental, just an artifact of the SI unit system.
 
Thank you Bill.
 
Thank you I've put your comment up on the video. When I finished it, I did start wondering how length contraction plays a role. I haven't really heard much about Gaussian units but I will give it a go.
 
Bill_K said:
Nothing could illustrate better than this, the harm done by teaching SI units. The speed of light is not "a function of two universal constants". Look up 'Gaussian units' on Wikipedia, and read how ε0 and μ0 are not in any way fundamental, just an artifact of the SI unit system.
Oh, that's a shock to me. So the idea that ε0 and μ0 are 'properties' is wrong ?

Does this mean that Maxwell's equations give no support to the assertion that the speed of light is locally the same ?
 
Last edited:
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Abstract The gravitational-wave signal GW250114 was observed by the two LIGO detectors with a network matched-filter signal-to-noise ratio of 80. The signal was emitted by the coalescence of two black holes with near-equal masses ## m_1=33.6_{-0.8}^{+1.2} M_{⊙} ## and ## m_2=32.2_{-1. 3}^{+0.8} M_{⊙}##, and small spins ##\chi_{1,2}\leq 0.26 ## (90% credibility) and negligible eccentricity ##e⁢\leq 0.03.## Postmerger data excluding the peak region are consistent with the dominant quadrupolar...
Back
Top