Checking if Point Lies on Nurbs Surface

  • Thread starter Thread starter sundar0206
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Plane Point
sundar0206
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Just had a simple question. but jus wanted to know if it had a simple answer...
Is there any way to know if a given point lies on a nurbs surface .?

Thanks in advance
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Yes, but it might require a bit of work. A nurbs surface consists of a collection of patches, each of which has a rational function description. You need to check if the point satisfies the description for any patch, taking into account the patch limits.
 
How is this done actually? Sorry I am not too well versed so can you please explain

Regards
 
sundar0206 said:
How is this done actually? Sorry I am not too well versed so can you please explain

Regards

To help you I need to know precisely your understanding of how a nurbs surface is represented. In other words what is the form of the equations describing the surface.

I suggest you look up nurbs (via google or bing) to get some idea.
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top