Chem. Engineering Undergrad, Physics Grad Possibility

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the potential paths available for a chemical engineering undergraduate considering a Master's degree in Physics. Participants explore the implications of such a transition, including the necessary coursework and career opportunities that may arise from pursuing graduate studies in physics versus continuing in chemical engineering or related fields.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that pursuing a Master's in Physics may require completing a qualifying year to cover undergraduate physics courses that were not part of their chemical engineering curriculum.
  • Another participant expresses a preference for staying connected to chemical engineering while also being interested in physics research, indicating uncertainty about the career implications of a Master's in Physics.
  • There is a suggestion that a Master's in Physics could open doors to various careers, but a PhD may be more beneficial for those interested in theoretical and research positions.
  • One participant questions the relevance of a physics degree for a career strictly in chemical engineering, suggesting it might not be worthwhile unless the individual intends to pursue research in physics.
  • Another participant mentions the possibility of nuclear engineering as a field that combines aspects of both chemical engineering and physics, indicating it as a potential middle ground.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing opinions on the value of a Master's in Physics for a chemical engineering graduate. While some see potential benefits in pursuing physics, others question its relevance to a career in chemical engineering, leading to an unresolved discussion on the best path forward.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the need for additional coursework in physics for those transitioning from chemical engineering, and there are varying assumptions about the applicability of a physics degree to careers in engineering fields.

jayeffarr
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I am currently a junior in the chemical engineering program at my school and have now started debating possible paths I can take after I graduate. What I'm interested in are what type of possibilities are out there for engineers who choose to Master in Physics and not in their respective undergrad subject?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
if you choose to go to grad school for physics you will probably have to go through a qualifying year in which you would have to take a lot of the physics courses you didn't take in your undergrad. I am also a chemical engineer and the only required physics for me was 3 basic classes so I am assuming your curriculum is similar. I thought of doing the same thing at one point but decided on going to grad school for nuclear engineering rather than physics. although I will likely have to do the same qualifying year since most of the classes are different.

If you got a masters in physics it woud certainly open some doors into other careers, a Phd would be a lot better, especially if you are looking to get into theory and research. Are you still looking to work as a chemical engineer or want to get a job in the physics field after your masters?
 
Both fields of study fascinate me, though I may change my mind as time goes on. I would almost prefer to stay somewhere connected with chemical engineering since it would be my undergrad study.

At the same time I also yearn to doing research within physics.
I'm just not sure what way a Master's in Physics would lead me, as far as career choices with a chem.E. Bachelor's. Even a possible PhD in physics for the hell of it.
 
I'm not exactly sure how the physics degree would help you as a chem e. Perhaps someone with more experience in the physics field would be able to answer that for you. But if you want to do research within physics then obviously getting a graduate degree in physics is the way to go. I am also interested in both paths and decided nuclear engineering was kind of a middleground that involved a little of both fields. In my opinion, you should try make a definite decision on what you want to do. If you want to work solely as a chemical engineer I don't see the physics degree helping very much and getting a graduate degree in it might be a waste of time if you end up working as a chem e in the end. However, as I stated before, this could be wrong and someone with more knowledge of physics careers might be able to offer better advice. Maybe someone knows of another field, other than nuclear e, that you will have to utilize everything from both a physics and chem e degree.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K