Chem: Equilibrium Constant Question

AI Thread Summary
In the equilibrium reaction PCl5 <--> PCl3 + Cl2 with an equilibrium constant Keq of 4.16e-2, the initial concentrations are 1.0 M for PCl5 and 0.204 M for both PCl3 and Cl2. When the volume of the closed system is doubled, the concentrations of PCl5, PCl3, and Cl2 are adjusted to account for the change in volume, leading to new concentrations of 0.5 M for PCl5 and 0.102 M for both PCl3 and Cl2. The equilibrium shifts to the right due to the increased volume, resulting in a need to solve for the new equilibrium concentrations using the adjusted values. The solution confirms that the initial concentration is halved and the equilibrium shifts accordingly.
BioBabe91
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


For the equilibrium PCl5 <---> PCl3 + Cl2, all gases, Keq = 4.16e-2. The equilibrium concentration of PCl5 is 1.0 M, and both PCl3 and Cl2 are 0.204 M. If the volume of this closed system is doubled, what are the concentrations of each gas when a new equilibrium is reached?


Homework Equations


Keq = ([product 1]^n * [product 2]^n) / ([reactant 1]^n * [reactant 2]^n)

The Attempt at a Solution


old E: 1 M, 0.204 M, 0.204 M
new E: PCl5: 1-x, PCl3: 0.204+x, Cl2: 0.204+x
since the equilibrium would shift to the right where there's more moles.
Now, when I try to solve it, I run into an obstacle:
4.16e-2 = ((0.204+x)(0.204+x))/(1-x)
4.16e-2 - 4.16e-2(x) = 0.0416+0.408x+x^2
0 = x^2 + 0.4496x
0 = x(x+0.4496)
But x cannot be negative!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The volume doubles for for the new E you'd have to use 0.5-x and 0.102+x as your concentrations.
 
Ooh that makes sense now... so the initial concentration is halved AND the equilibrium shifts.
Would have never figured that out. Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top