Chemical engineering, is it for me?

AI Thread Summary
A 17-year-old college student is contemplating a degree in chemical engineering or mathematics, having chosen A levels in physics, further maths, chemistry, and maths. The student appreciates the salary potential of chemical engineering but is uncertain about their enjoyment of math in a theoretical university setting. Discussions highlight that math is a versatile skill, allowing for flexibility in career options, while engineering disciplines often share common first-year courses, delaying the need for specialization. Practicality is emphasized, suggesting that a math degree may not align with the desire for hands-on work. Ultimately, the student leans towards mathematics for its broad opportunities.
Foulassassin
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm a college student 17 years of age; I'm at the point in life where I need to use what degree I want to do. I have chosen the following a levels:
- Physics
- Further maths
- Chemistry
- Maths
At the moment I'm thinking of doing either chemical engineering or maths.
I have always been fond of maths but I don't if I'll start to hate at uni as it's all theory based.
Also chemical engineering I have chosen because it includes all my a levels and of course the salary :approve:.
Though the problem is I don't know if I'll like either of them; so what kind of questions should I be asking myself before making a choice.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Money doesn't care what you like.
 
Math is a very widely applicable skill, so you can study it and keep your options open for changing to another major if math loses its appeal. Note that cryptography is applied math and a major growth area in the economy.
Physics is a near math discipline, chemistry rather less so, both areas are directly tied to large segments of industry, with job opportunities to match.
 
You are set up pretty well for any type of engineering (mech, electrical, chem, civil, aerospace, etc ...) at university, or physics, chemistry or maths.

The engineering courses in the first year are often common to all the disciplines, so you don't really have to make a decision about what to specialize in until the second year.

If you want to be involved in something "practical", maybe a maths degree isn't the best choice for you. You will probably find there's a much larger maths content in university-level engineering or science than in A level science courses.
 
After intense research I think I'll do maths, as it leaves me with so many choices at the end. Thanks for the advise guys!
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top