Chemist Needs Assistance with Flowmeters for Mixers

  • Thread starter Thread starter dtwright03
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Assistance Chemist
AI Thread Summary
A chemist in R&D for coatings is facing challenges with a highly reactive mix that rapidly increases in viscosity, complicating the production of consistent sample materials. To address this, they plan to use a 1/2"x11" static mixer with two feed streams at different pressures. They seek advice on whether converging air lines at different pressures would cause significant backflow, given the viscosity difference. Additionally, they inquire about valves that could prevent backflow of both air and liquid to ensure accurate mixing proportions. Ultimately, they resolved the issue by using an old positive displacement pump to replace the air lines.
dtwright03
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
I work in R&D for coatings and have a bit of a plumbing problem on my pilot coater. I've formulated a very reactive mix that, once mixed, increases in viscosity by 3000cP an hour. This makes it very difficult to get a constant roll of sample material to send to customers with the equipment that I have available.

SO, I want to get a 1/2"x11" static mixer and use two feed streams to resolve this issue. My question should be simple to a trained professional. If I have one air line feeding a pressure pot 10psi and another feeding a second pressure pot 20psi, would you expect that converging these lines into a static mixer would create significant backflow at a final flow rate around 0.01gpm venting to atmosphere? Both mixes differ in viscosity by 5000cP. Alternatively, is there a valve that prevents backflow of both air and liquid to give me peace of mind that the proportions are being fed correctly?

I sadly don't have $1000 for a couple of flowmeters...Here's a handy dandy picture.

upload_2017-5-22_16-56-24.png
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Found an old positive displacement pump to replace the air lines and problem solved..
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...

Similar threads

Back
Top