Chemistry - Adding Strong Acid to Buffer

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the change in pH when a strong acid is added to an acetic acid buffer solution. The initial pH of the buffer is 5.00, with a total molarity of 0.1 M for the acid and conjugate base. The student initially calculated the pH change to be -0.40 after adding HCl, but doubts the accuracy of this result. Other participants pointed out that the student used an incorrect ratio for the concentrations of the acid and base, emphasizing the need to correctly calculate the initial concentrations based on the given pH and total molarity. Accurate calculations are crucial for determining the correct pH change in buffer solutions.
sam.
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A beaker with 135 mL of an acetic acid buffer with a pH of 5.00 is sitting on a benchtop. The total molarity of acid and conjugate base in this buffer is 0.1 M. A student adds 7.80 mL of a 0.400 M solution to the beaker. How much will the pH change? The pKa of acetic acid is 4.76.


Homework Equations



Henderson-Hasselbach equation: pH = pKa + log([base]/[acid])

The Attempt at a Solution



hat I did was find the total number of moles of acid + base = 0.0135. Then using the pH = pKa + log([base]/[acid]) I found the ratio of [base]/[acid] to be 1.74. Then using these two equations I found the moles of acid to be 4.93*10^-3 and base = 5.45*10^-3. Next I found the moles of HCl = 0.00312 mol and substracted that from the base and added it to the acid so: acid = 8.05*10^-3 and base = 5.45*10^-3. Now I put these values into pH = pKa + log([base]/[acid]) and got the pH to be 4.59...therefore the change would be -0.40...But I think this value is too high...I think it's supposed to be lower. Can anyone tell me where I went wrong? Any help is appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
sam. said:

Homework Statement


A beaker with 135 mL of an acetic acid buffer with a pH of 5.00 is sitting on a benchtop. The total molarity of acid and conjugate base in this buffer is 0.1 M. A student adds 7.80 mL of a 0.400 M solution to the beaker. How much will the pH change? The pKa of acetic acid is 4.76.

7.80 mL of a 0.400 M solution of what? Possibly a strong acid? I'll assume it is a strong acid (HCl).

The Attempt at a Solution



What I did was find the total number of moles of acid + base = 0.0135.
No. What does your question say about the total concentration of the acid [HA] and conjugate base[A-]? It isn't 0.0135.

Next I found the moles of HCl = 0.00312 mol
This part is right.

... and substracted that from the base and added it to the acid so: acid = 8.05*10^-3 and base = 5.45*10^-3. Now I put these values into pH = pKa + log([base]/[acid]) and got the pH to be 4.59...therefore the change would be -0.40...But I think this value is too high...I think it's supposed to be lower. Can anyone tell me where I went wrong? Any help is appreciated.
Your logic is sound here but you used the wrong value for the ratio of [A-]/[HA]. Can you calculate initial [A-] given only the initial pH? You should also keep in mind that [A-](initial) + [HA](initial) = 0.1 and that total doesn't change throughout the problem, only the individual values of [A-] and [HA].

Hope it helps.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top