Chemistry Help: Example of Reaction Involving Particles

  • Thread starter Thread starter hot_sauce
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chemistry
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a chemistry homework question regarding a reaction where one substance (A) is dissolved while another (B) is consumed, both in the same phase. The student seeks clarification on the type of reaction this scenario represents and the most common particle involved that is not consumed. The student expresses frustration with their struggles in chemistry, despite being proficient in their engineering studies. They emphasize the urgency of understanding this topic to earn bonus points for passing the course. The conversation highlights the challenges faced by students in grasping complex subjects outside their primary field of study.
hot_sauce
Messages
24
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Can you please help me with a question ?

.Something that isn't consumed by the reaction (so say A) is dissolved at the same time as something that is consumed by the reaction (B) in a solvent, so that they are in the same phase...what is this reaction an example of?

Part2) What is the most pervasive particle that is involved in an example of this type of reaction that isn't consumed by the reaction?




The Attempt at a Solution



I don't have any attempts. Before someone gets angry please read what I have to say. I am a student of Systems engineering and this is totally not my field. I had CHemistry in semester 1 and I have kept on failing this course. I just want to get those bonus questions so I can PASS this course. I am a good student I can post my report cards online but I am good at the stuff I got into this engineering for. YOu can see my previous posts and see that I am good with circuits and EMT related subjects. I just want to get these bonus points and get on with my life please !
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You dissolve something and you have two different things present in the solution. Think what soluble substances you know.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top