SbF5 said:
Good for you. I worked with plenty of people with degrees in Biology, Animal Sciences, etc. that were still called 'Chemists' because they took Gen and O Chem and could run a test. This won't be the case with engineers.
I work in the paper industry, and at my work we have several production engineers who have pure science degrees such as biology, physics, and yes, chemistry. In fact, two of the best engineers at my mill have biology degrees.
So those "chemists" you're talking about who have biology degrees are as much chemists as some of the engineers here are engineers even though they don't technically have engineering degrees.
Furthermore, we do have quite a bit of ChE's here as well, and no, they do not take that much chemistry. If a ChE has taken a lot of chemistry then either he came from a university that upped their standards, or he decided to take it upon himself to take more chemistry than what was required.
Quite a number of chemistry majors are trying to get into some sort of medical field. So they tend to focus their electives on the biological sciences to fulfill the prerequisites for med school. However, it is entirely possible that a Chem major could decide to focus his electives on math and physics. And at this point, the only thing lacking would be dedicated engineering courses. So how close a ChE is to a chemist, or how close a chemist is to a ChE depends on the individual and what they decided to do.
I can tell you guys now that we have ChE's from all over the U.S., and almost without exception, the
required chemistry courses are (based on semester systems):
Gen Chem 1 & 2
Organic 1
P. Chem 1
Biochem 1
And that's it. And many people mistake general chemistry as inorganic when the two classes are as different as gen Chem is from organic Chem.
On the flip side, chemistry majors are typically only required to go up to calc 2 and principles of physics 1 and 2.