Chemistry Q&A: Mass of 111 Gold Atoms + Atomic Mass of S

  • Thread starter Thread starter Joules23
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chemistry
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the mass of 111 gold atoms, one must first determine the number of moles in 111 atoms and then multiply by the atomic weight of gold, which is the weight in grams of one mole. The atomic mass of sulfur (S) is approximately 32.066 because it represents the average mass of its isotopes, factoring in the contributions of protons and neutrons, while the negligible mass of electrons is typically not included. The atomic mass is not a whole number due to the presence of multiple isotopes and their respective abundances. Understanding Avogadro's number is essential for these calculations. Accurate comprehension of atomic mass as an average is crucial in chemistry.
Joules23
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
1) mass (grams) of 111 gold atoms
----------

would i simply multiply the atomic weight of Au by 111?

2) Why is the atomic mass of S = 32.066?
----------

is it because this is how much the neutrons and protons weigh?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1.) No. The atomic weight of gold as listed is the weight in grams of on mole of gold atoms. You must find out how many moles 111 atoms is then use that number

2.) Sort of. Yes the atomic mass is the mass of all the stuff in the atom ie protons neutrons and electrons (though the mass of electrons is negligible normally). However the reason that its not a whole number is due to it being an average of different isotopic masses.
 
Avagadro's number FTW! FunkyDawrf gave you a perfect definition of the atomic mass. Also the atomic mass is actually the average atomic mass. Just a good thing to keep in mind
 
Last edited:
Also the atomic mass is actually the average atomic mass. Just a good thing to keep in mind

i said in my original...
owever the reason that its not a whole number is due to it being an average of different isotopic masses.
I did keep it in mind :)
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top