Chemistry - Quick question about standard reductions of half-cells

Thread starter Fusilli_Jerry89
Start date May 31, 2007
Tags

Chemistry Standard

AI Thread Summary

Adding acid to a solution alters the conditions under which standard reduction potentials are calculated, specifically regarding the use of the H2 half-reaction. When acid is present, the H2 half-reaction is not applicable, while it remains relevant when a base is added. This distinction is crucial for accurate electrochemical calculations. Clarification on the specific reaction in question is necessary for a more detailed discussion. Understanding the impact of pH on half-cell reactions is essential for proper application in chemistry.

May 31, 2007

Fusilli_Jerry89

my teacher says that if you add acid to the solution then you don't use the H2) half reaction with the (10-7 M), but that you still do if you add a base. Is this true?

Physics news on Phys.org

Jun 5, 2007

chaoseverlasting

I don't even know what you're question is... could you please specify what reaction or what is it that youre doing?

Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'

TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...

View full post »

Thread 'Prove that evolution is constant (Provide at least two arguments to support your position)'

I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

View full post »