Chemistry [Spectrophotometry difficult example]

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dousin12
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chemistry Example
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on applying Beer-Lambert law to a spectrophotometry problem involving the absorbance of iron and copper in a solution. The key equation, A = ε * l * c, is used to relate absorbance to concentration, where the total absorbance is the sum of the individual absorbances of each substance. Participants emphasize that the observed absorbance can be calculated by adding the contributions from each component, which is crucial for understanding the setup of the equations. Clarification is sought on why absorbances are additive, particularly when multiple substances are present. The explanation reiterates that each substance absorbs light independently, making the total absorbance a cumulative measure.
Dousin12
Messages
43
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


349fce81d2206bdcd2d1a6293b2e70bc.png


Homework Equations


A=epsilon*l*c

The Attempt at a Solution


So I was wondering on how to set up the equations now, since I don't have much information? Which equations should i use to solve the problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have all the information needed. Assume the observed absorbance is the sum of individual absorbances.
 
Please help me understand how I should set up the equations!

91ebaf011f2f50623d16ab8bc7d8c5e0.png


This is a big questionmark to me, why u should this?
0.183 = 9970*concentration of Fe + 34*concentration of cupper. Why is 0.183 equal to that?
 
This is a direct application of the Lambert's Beer law which you wrote in your first post, and the fact that the observed absorbance is a sum of absorbances of copper and iron.

Assuming there is no copper, can you write formulas for the absorbances of the solution at both wavelengths? Can you do the same for iron? Can you add these values?
 
I still have really difficult! To understand why you add these values!
 
Dousin12 said:
I still have really difficult! To understand why you add these values!

Which part of the "absorbance is additive" statement is not clear to you?

If there is more than one substance present in the solution, each absorbs on its own, so the observed total absorbance is a sum of individual absorbances (at least for relatively diluted solutions).
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Back
Top