Chemists learn more about how life started on earth?

AI Thread Summary
A team of chemists at the MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Cambridge has made significant strides in understanding the origins of life on Earth, as detailed in their paper published in Nature Chemistry. They mapped out a series of chemical reactions that could lead to the formation of essential biomolecules, including sugars, amino acids, ribonucleotides, and glycerol, which are crucial for metabolism and the creation of proteins and RNA. However, the study does not claim to have definitively solved the origin of life, as it focuses on potential pathways for biomolecule formation rather than how these molecules could organize into living systems. Critics point out that the proposed reactions may not have been feasible on early Earth due to factors like the availability of cyanide. The field remains open to various hypotheses, with ongoing research exploring alternative scenarios for biomolecule formation, such as meteorite impact simulations.
Messages
19,772
Reaction score
10,723
Chemists claim to have solved riddle of how life began on Earth
http://phys.org/news/2015-03-chemists-riddle-life-began-earth.html

A team of chemists working at the MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, at Cambridge in the UK believes they have solved the mystery of how it was possible for life to begin on Earth over four billion years ago. In their paper published in the journal Nature Chemistry, the team describes how they were able to map reactions that produced two and three-carbon sugars, amino acids, ribonucleotides and glycerol—the material necessary for metabolism and for creating the building blocks of proteins and ribonucleic acid molecules and also for allowing for the creation of lipids that form cell membranes.

Here is the journal article
http://www.nature.com/nchem/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nchem.2202.html

55097cc7b29d5.jpg
 
Last edited:
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Greg Bernhardt said:
Chemists claim to have solved riddle of how life began on Earth

Nope. The study does not claim to have solved the origin of life as the headline claims (to be fair, the headline is PhysOrg's fault, as I'm sure the authors of the study would not make that claim). The study does present a set of reactions that could potentially serve as the origin of biomolecules on Earth, which is still quite an impressive and important feat. The origin of life – how these biomolecules might organize into a living system – is a separate but related issue that is not addressed in the study.

There are reasons to think that the proposed sequence of reactions may not have been plausible on early Earth (for example, this article cites a researcher who questions whether high enough concentrations of cyanide would have been available), and there are other hypotheses for how these molecules could have formed (for example, a recent study used lasers to simulate the conditions of a meteorite impact and showed that such conditions could promote the formation of the nucleobases from formamide, though Sutherland's paper has the advantage in that his scheme produces nucleosides, not just nucleobases). This is very much an open area of research, and it will certainly take much thought and debate to sort through the various hypotheses out there.
 
  • Like
Likes Greg Bernhardt
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!

Similar threads

Back
Top