Chiral theories and matter gauges

[sirchasm]

Is it true that classical theories tend to treat matter 'in the limit' of large N, or it encodes matter in N_A as N_A(m_e,e) say, and chiral theories need to include \hbar which classicality sees as \{G(h),c\}?

We use 'mass-free' theories that treat charge and spin momentum in circuits = manifolds with linear/nonlinear operators.
Algebraically these manifolds can operate at linear (<<nonlinear) limits that treat charge algebraically and do not rotate spin or they operate in a N(e + s) domain that keeps N(s) at 0.

We need theories that include a mass-spin term?

 

[sirchasm]

that N(e + s) thing should be able to explain how N gauges charge e (in my notation), and spin-potential s, in a mass-free index; When we use much smaller N than N_A\, of charge and spin,we see distributed phase momenta = discrete products.

We haven't been able to connect the enumerable side of Avogadro's number to the way spin and charge evolve over the 'mass-field', or extend algebraically.