Choosing a School for Engineering

  • Thread starter Thread starter d=vt+1/2at^2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Engineering School
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the decision of a high school student in Canada considering engineering programs, specifically whether to attend Waterloo directly for civil engineering or take a general first-year engineering program at McMaster or UofT. While Waterloo is noted for its strong co-op program and immediate specialization in civil engineering, concerns are raised about its reputation primarily in computer and electrical fields. McMaster and UofT offer common first-year programs that may provide broader foundational knowledge, but could delay co-op opportunities. Participants emphasize the importance of hands-on experience and project involvement in engineering education, suggesting that smaller universities also have valuable programs. Ultimately, the choice should align with the student's career goals and desired experiences in engineering.
d=vt+1/2at^2
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hey guys, what's up. I live in Canada and am currently in high school. However, next year I believe I will be going to university for engineering. I am interested in civil, however, I'm not sure if I should rush off right to Waterloo without taking a year of general first year engineering first. That's my problem. Instead of going right to Waterloo, I could go to McMaster, and do a common first year with every engineering student. In terms of distance from my home, Waterloo is 1 and 1/2 hours, and McMaster is 2 hours away.

Thanks for any guidance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You could also go to UofT and enter their TrackOne program, which is a general 1st year engineering thing. Although taking this route you would miss out on UW's awesome co-op program! But Waterloo is known more for computers/math/electrical than it is for civil/mechanical, my impression is that UofT is better in that area.
 
You could go to Waterloo or McMaster but you should also look at the other Ontario Universities. In terms of quality some of the smaller universities have good reputation that involve a lot of hands on R and D style projects in the upper years. Carleton has a fourth year project system in which students from the various schools of engineering design and model some rather neat stuff like a UAV and FormulaSAE car. Look for a school that will give you experience as well as theoretical knowledge.

Also come on civil try something cool like Aero. Just kidding got a little bit of bias towards Aero.
 
"However, I'm not sure if I should rush off right to Waterloo without taking a year of general first year engineering first. That's my problem."

Are you sure you want to be in civil? Heres the thing. If you are, why would u want to take a year of general engineering? Civil at waterloo specializes you right away and gets you ready for your first co-op. I have many friends in civil and i myself am in mech and we're all doing great. I'm 19 and I'm earning 12k in my 4month co-op term. My friend in civil is working on his 2nd co-op term in Boston and is having a great time. Tell me any other university that could offer you an experience like that.

It is true that Waterloo is more well known for its comp/EE engineering, but UT's reputation is no more than its grad work. I'm working with 2 UT co-ops at my work, both finished their 3rd year and neither of them quite frankly I feel, work professionally at all.

And yes, waterloo will offer all the student teams other schools will offer if not more but as a civil I'm not sure what projects you could work on (they are mostly projects for Mech, systems, EE, etc..) Regardless, u won't ahv to wait till 4th year like carleton, teams readliy recruit 1st years.

Yes, I seem biased, but everything I've said here is the truth.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Back
Top