Choosing an Area of Physics to Study

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on experiences related to choosing a focus in Physics during graduate school. Participants reflect on when they identified their area of interest, with some noting a lack of passion in their initial fields. One individual shared that after completing a master's degree, they felt unfulfilled and considered leaving Physics but were encouraged by a post-doc to explore medical physics, which ultimately led to satisfaction in their career. Regarding prior research experience, some participants admitted to having none before graduate school, while others engaged in informal learning through seminars and discussions with potential supervisors. There was a consensus that many did not have a clear understanding of their chosen field before enrolling in graduate programs, often influenced by their undergraduate interests or peer discussions rather than direct mentorship from professors. Overall, the dialogue highlights the importance of exploration and guidance in selecting a graduate focus in Physics.
KMcFadden
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
I have a few questions for those of you that have enrolled in or completed graduate school:

1. When during your college career did you know what area of Physics you wanted to focus on?

2. Did you do any research in that area before graduate school?

3. How much did you know about that area of Physics prior to graduate school?

4. Was your decision based on the area of Physics that a previous professor was engaged in?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
KMcFadden said:
1. When during your college career did you know what area of Physics you wanted to focus on?
After my master's degree I knew I wasn't happy in the field I was in. I did okay in it, but I didn't have any passion for learning beyond what was assigned to me. I considered giving up physics altogether, but then a post-doc who was also considering jumping fields talked me into checking out a program in another field (medical physics). It turned out very well for me.

(I might note that in Canada it's a lot more common to do an MSc prior to PhD work.)

2. Did you do any research in that area before graduate school?
None.

3. How much did you know about that area of Physics prior to graduate school?
In undergrad I paid little attention to it. I was a lot more interested in astrophysics at the time. I had a number of friends in it though, so I attended seminars both locally and at a conference that I otherwise wouldn't have. Prior to enrolling in the PhD however (while I was completing my MSc) I began attending seminars at the local cancer facility. I talked with a number of potential supervisors and learned as much as I could about the field.


4. Was your decision based on the area of Physics that a previous professor was engaged in?
No. I had some great professors in undergrad (and a few not so great ones). But for whatever reason few of them ever talked about their own research during lectures - probably because it would have taken up too much time.
 
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
Back
Top