Choosing fundamental journals or conferences

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the challenges faced by a researcher seeking appropriate journals or conferences for submitting work on special relativity. The user, Farhad70, lacks an advisor and has primarily studied historical works by Michael Faraday, James Clerk Maxwell, Oliver Heaviside, and Hendrik Lorentz, without citing any recent literature. Forum members emphasize the importance of reviewing contemporary research and familiarizing oneself with relevant journals to ensure the validity and relevance of one’s work.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of special relativity and its historical context
  • Familiarity with academic writing and paper submission processes
  • Knowledge of key figures in physics, such as Faraday, Maxwell, Heaviside, and Lorentz
  • Ability to conduct literature reviews and identify relevant journals
NEXT STEPS
  • Research contemporary journals in physics, focusing on special relativity
  • Learn about the process of writing and submitting academic papers
  • Explore literature review techniques to identify recent studies
  • Investigate academic networking opportunities to find mentors or advisors
USEFUL FOR

Researchers in physics, particularly those studying special relativity, graduate students seeking publication guidance, and individuals looking to improve their academic writing and research skills.

Farhad70
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I have done a fundamental research about relativity but i can't find right journal or conference.
can anyone help me?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Farhad70,

There might be a small language issue with your question. Do you mean you have done some research and are looking for an appropriate journal to submit to?

If so, this is a question you really need to be talking over with your advisor. As a general approach you can start with the journals that you have cited most frequently in your work and the ones that you read on a regular basis and then narrow the list by which one publishes the most similar articles.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Farhad70
Choppy said:
Hi Farhad70,

There might be a small language issue with your question.

Sorry for my language.

Do you mean you have done some research and are looking for an appropriate journal to submit to?

yes
I have done some research and i am looking for an appropriate journal to submit to.

If so, this is a question you really need to be talking over with your advisor. As a general approach you can start with the journals that you have cited most frequently in your work and the ones that you read on a regular basis and then narrow the list by which one publishes the most similar articles.

I don't have any advisor and my work is very basic and no one talk about that in many years. I'm looking for an appropriate journal about special relativity.
I have no one to help me in my country and i need physics forum's members to help me.
If you help me ...
 
Farhad70 said:
Sorry for my language.
yes
I have done some research and i am looking for an appropriate journal to submit to.
I don't have any advisor and my work is very basic and no one talk about that in many years. I'm looking for an appropriate journal about special relativity.
I have no one to help me in my country and i need physics forum's members to help me.
If you help me ...

We have frequent question of this nature, and it always rings my dubious bells each time I see it.

Here's the issue. One typically has to read A LOT of papers when one is doing research work. Otherwise, how would one knows if what one is working on is new, valid, correct, incorrect, not interesting, etc...etc. One must also already knows how to (i) write a proper paper and (ii) be aware of all the various journals out there in that particular field. This is because one has read all of these papers and has paid attention to where they were published.

Thus, when you ask a question like this, it creates something of a puzzle to me on whether you really have studied the ample amount of papers that have already been published in whatever area that you are "researching", and whether you have paid any attention to where those papers have been published. After all, you DO have references to cite in this "paper" that you intend to publish, don't you?

Zz.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Farhad70
ZapperZ said:
We have frequent question of this nature, and it always rings my dubious bells each time I see it.

Here's the issue. One typically has to read A LOT of papers when one is doing research work. Otherwise, how would one knows if what one is working on is new, valid, correct, incorrect, not interesting, etc...etc. One must also already knows how to (i) write a proper paper and (ii) be aware of all the various journals out there in that particular field. This is because one has read all of these papers and has paid attention to where they were published.

Thus, when you ask a question like this, it creates something of a puzzle to me on whether you really have studied the ample amount of papers that have already been published in whatever area that you are "researching", and whether you have paid any attention to where those papers have been published. After all, you DO have references to cite in this "paper" that you intend to publish, don't you?

Zz.

I'm grateful for your answer.

I studied Michael Faraday's experimental researches, Maxwell's works, Oliver Heaviside's works, Lorentz's work and around three thousands pages for my research.
These works published in many years ago.

Anyway, I'm grateful for your help.
P.S : Whatever more and more I walk this road, I'm sure that no one can realize my idea and my work.

 
Farhad70 said:
I'm grateful for your answer.

I studied Michael Faraday's experimental researches, Maxwell's works, Oliver Heaviside's works, Lorentz's work and around three thousands pages for my research.
These works published in many years ago.

Anyway, I'm grateful for your help.
P.S : Whatever more and more I walk this road, I'm sure that no one can realize my idea and my work.

Does that mean that you have zero references from within the last century? Do you think that the field hasn't advanced at all since then?

Zz.
 
ZapperZ said:
Does that mean that you have zero references from within the last century? Do you think that the field hasn't advanced at all since then?

Zz.

Yes
I don't have any references from 20 & 21 century.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 104 ·
4
Replies
104
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
16K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K