Programs Choosing the Right Ph.D. Group: Tips for Non-Academic Research Careers

  • Thread starter Thread starter dctyl3ee
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Group Ph.d Ph.d.
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a dilemma faced by an individual who has received three Ph.D. offers while preparing for a fellowship. Each offer presents a unique academic track in fields such as wireless power transfer, FLIM and integrated photonics, and electromagnetic metamaterials. The primary concern is which path is most favorable for a career in non-academic research. Participants suggest considering the career trajectories of past graduates from each group, as this could provide insight into job prospects. Ultimately, the emphasis is on aligning the decision with personal interests, as passion for the subject matter is crucial for long-term satisfaction and success in a chosen field. The consensus is that job opportunities exist in all areas, but the right fit depends on individual goals and interests.
dctyl3ee
I have a dilemma. I'm beginning a fellowship next week, and I have 3 Ph.D. offers for when it ends. I've worked in each group, and would have no issue continuing in any of them. I respect each advisor equally for different reasons. The main problem is each group requires a slightly different academic track. I have one week to decide. The only determining factor is which one is the most reasonable for a career in non-academic research. I'm working on wireless power transfer in one group. The other I'm working on FLIM, excitonics, and integrated photonics. The final offer is in electromagnetic and photonic metamaterials. Will I have any issues finding a job in any of these areas? I know it's probably not a question anyone else can answer, but I would really appreciate any advice or insight that anyone has to offer. Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you considered asking the advisors of each what the graduates of that group went on to do? Or perhaps it is on the group website or some such.
 
In all likelihood, you will be able to find work in any of these area when you finish. You don't need the probability of a job, bur in fact, you really only want one job. More than one is no help (since you probably cannot handle more than one full time job on an life-time basis), and a low probability does not mean there are no jobs, only that they are scarce.

The bigger factor, I think, is what do you want to do? Think hard on this, and go where your interest takes you.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
23
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Back
Top