Choosing the right professor to work with

  • Thread starter Thread starter mrund3rd09
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Professor Work
AI Thread Summary
Choosing the right professor for research is crucial for undergraduate students, especially in fields like chemical engineering. Many professors have limited time for mentoring, so finding a supportive graduate student or postdoc for guidance can be beneficial. Regular meetings with supervisors can help track progress and provide necessary feedback. It's normal for first-time researchers to feel overwhelmed, and significant achievements are not expected initially. Overall, maintaining open communication and demonstrating diligence can lead to positive outcomes, including potential recommendation letters for graduate school.
mrund3rd09
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
I'm a chem e undergrad btw. The professor I work for right now does his own stuff most of the time. the only times I'm in contact with him are the times I have a question, or I'm updating him with results.

This is my first research position, and I made a lot of mistakes in terms of organization and time management. I think it would have been better for me if my professor worked in the same lab as I do. Again, this is my first research job so I have no frame of reference.

I will need to get 2 letters of rec eventually for grad school, and I don't think I will be getting one from this professor, mainly because I don't think I've proven much. It was a learning experience though.

Give me any advice you know, and be as specific as you can. For example, what do you mean when you say "find a professor that mentors you." Technically, they all mentor you. Please be specific.

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Most professors are not going to be able to spend much time mentoring undergraduates and giving them any guidance. Instead, I'd say that the most important thing is to find a helpful and knowledgeable graduate student or postdoc in the lab who is willing to help guide you.
 
Based on what you've said, you have a fairly typical arrangement. Most professors won't babysit the students that work for them 24/7. Rather (in good scenarios anyway) they will establish regular meetings (say once per week) where you give updates on your progress and they offer guidance. The good ones are also available on a regular, reliable basis for informal discussions.

Also, I don't think it's fair to expect to make major advances in a first research position. Be diligent in your approach and learn as much as you can. Make sure you discuss your difficulties with your supervisor so that he or she is informed on where you are stumped. Solicit specific feedback. And remember, the simple fact that you're in that person's lab, working for him or her and making an honest effort is usually enough to get a decent reference letter.
 
mrund3rd09 said:
I'm a chem e undergrad btw. The professor I work for right now does his own stuff most of the time. the only times I'm in contact with him are the times I have a question, or I'm updating him with results.

That's how research works. I don't think that you'll find a professor who does it much different. I know it takes some adjusting the first time you'll do research, but try to learn from it. The more you get used to the situation now, the better you'll do in the future.

I will need to get 2 letters of rec eventually for grad school, and I don't think I will be getting one from this professor, mainly because I don't think I've proven much. It was a learning experience though.

You'll be surprised how well you did! Don't expect to invent some groundbreaking stuff the first time. Your professor might be impressed because you did so much work on your own, because you were willing to work,...
Your professor knows very well how hard the first time research can be. So I'm sure that he'll make he's conclusions based on that fact!
thanks[/QUOTE]
 
actually, It's a scientist that I report to. And this scientist reports to the professor that supervises me.

I don't know if that changes anything..
 
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Back
Top