Circle Series Reciprocal: Taking the Reciprocal of an Infinite Series

Unit
Messages
181
Reaction score
0
I understand how this works:

\cos x = \frac{1}{0!} - \frac{x^2}{2!} + \frac{x^4}{4!} - \frac{x^6}{6!} + \frac{x^8}{8!} - \frac{x^{10}}{10!} + \ldots

But what about this?

\frac{1}{\cos x} = \frac{1}{0!} + \frac{x^2}{2!} + \frac{5x^4}{4!} + \frac{61x^6}{6!} + \frac{1385x^8}{8!} + \frac{50521x^{10}}{10!} + \ldots

Is there a way to take the reciprocal of an infinite series or is it necessary to take subsequent derivatives of secant and write the Taylor expansion that way?

Thanks,
Unit
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Suppose f(x) is analytic in a domain containing x_{0} and f(x_{0}) \neq 0. Then, 1/f(x) is also analytic. Both of these functions have Taylor series expansions around x_{0}:

<br /> f(x) = \sum_{n = 0}^{\infty}{a_{n} \, (x - x_{0})^{n}}, \; a_{0} \neq 0<br /><br /> \frac{1}{f(x)} = \sum_{n = 0}^{\infty}{b_{n} \, (x - x_{0})^{n}}<br />

Multiplying the two series term by term, we get:

<br /> \sum_{n = 0}^{\infty}{\left(\sum_{m = 0}^{n}{a_{n - m} \, b_{m}}\right) \, (x - x_{0})^{n}} = 1<br />

from where, we get the following conditions for the coefficients [itex[\{b_{n}\}[/itex]:

<br /> a_{0} \, b_{0} = 1 \; \Rightarrow \; b_{0} = \frac{1}{a_{0}}<br />

<br /> \sum_{m = 0}^{n}{a_{n - m} \, b_{m}} = 0, \; n \ge 1 \; \Rightarrow \; \sum_{m = 1}^{n}{a_{n - m} \, b_{m}} = -\frac{a_{n}}{a_{0}}<br />

The matrix of this system is:

<br /> A = \left(\begin{array}{ccccc}<br /> a_{0} &amp; 0 &amp; \ldots &amp; 0 &amp; \ldots \\<br /> <br /> a_{1} &amp; a_{0} &amp; \ldots &amp; 0 &amp; \ldots \\<br /> <br /> \ldots &amp; &amp; &amp; &amp; \\<br /> <br /> a_{n - 1} &amp; a_{n - 2} &amp; \ldots &amp; a_{0} &amp; \ldots \\<br /> <br /> \ldots &amp; &amp; &amp; &amp; <br /> \end{array}\right)<br />

It is an infinitely dimensional lower triangular matrix. If we restrict it to the first n rows, then the determinant is simply \det A_{n} = a^{n}_{0} \neq 0, so the matrix is never singluar and the inverse always exists. However, it is pretty difficult to find an analytical form for it in the general case.
 
Dickfore is correct about the difficulties in finding inverse of infinity series. I have written a paper about finding power series of tan x + sec x. And I think Unit may take a look in it. For the secant series, it just corresponds to the even power of the series, as tan x is odd, and sec x is even.

http://www.voofie.com/content/117/an-explicit-formula-for-the-euler-zigzag-numbers-updown-numbers-from-power-series/"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top