[Circuits] Finding the Thevenin and Norton Equivalents #3

  • Context: Engineering 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ainster31
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuits Thevenin
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the process of finding Thevenin and Norton equivalents in electrical circuits, specifically addressing the calculation of Thevenin resistance (Rth). A participant encountered a negative value for Rth due to the incorrect direction of the injected current source. The correct approach involves ensuring that the polarity of the voltage measurement aligns with the direction of the current injection, which affects the sign of the resulting voltage across the terminals. The key takeaway is that proper assignment of current direction and voltage polarity is crucial for accurate resistance determination.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Thevenin and Norton equivalents
  • Familiarity with circuit analysis techniques
  • Knowledge of current sources and voltage measurements
  • Basic principles of electrical resistance
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of Thevenin's theorem in depth
  • Learn about Norton’s theorem and its applications
  • Explore circuit simulation tools like LTspice for practical analysis
  • Review polarity conventions in electrical measurements
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineering students, circuit designers, and anyone involved in circuit analysis and design will benefit from this discussion.

ainster31
Messages
158
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



vtG9YnW.png


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Attached to this post. I had to take the absolute value of Rth. What did I do wrong to get a negative value for Rth?
 

Attachments

  • 4.57 Attempt.jpg
    4.57 Attempt.jpg
    27.9 KB · Views: 664
Physics news on Phys.org
ainster31 said:

The Attempt at a Solution



Attached to this post. I had to take the absolute value of Rth. What did I do wrong to get a negative value for Rth?

No doubt it has to do with the direction of the current that you're "injecting" into the circuit versus the polarity of the resulting voltage across the terminals. The resistance of a component (or circuit for that matter) is defined as the current into the port divided by the resulting potential across that port. The polarity of the voltage "measurement" is such that the terminal where the current is injected is taken to be positive:

attachment.php?attachmentid=66261&stc=1&d=1391463145.gif
 

Attachments

  • Fig2.gif
    Fig2.gif
    1.1 KB · Views: 665
So my mistake was that the 1A current source was pointing down when it should've been pointing up?
 
ainster31 said:
So my mistake was that the 1A current source was pointing down when it should've been pointing up?

Not a mistake per se, not if you take it into account when you assign the polarity of the voltage. You are looking for the potential at terminal a with respect to terminal b, so automatically that implies that the a terminal is the where you'd put the + lead of your meter (if you were measuring it). You are driving the current into the b terminal, so it becomes the "+" terminal for the resistance determination. That's contrary to the desired arrangement, and will result in a reversed sign for the voltage Vab.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
11K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K