[Circuits] Solving a KCL Problem

  • Context: Engineering 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ainster31
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuits Kcl
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion addresses a common misunderstanding in circuit analysis, specifically regarding Kirchhoff's Current Law (KCL) as applied to a circuit with node V2. The participant initially questions the existence of the circuit due to the observation of three currents entering node V2 without any exiting. However, it is clarified that by calculating the voltage at V2, which is 62.89V, one can determine that currents of 0.29A and 4.90A actually flow out of V2, resolving the apparent contradiction. The key takeaway is the importance of consistent current direction assumptions when applying KCL.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Kirchhoff's Current Law (KCL)
  • Basic knowledge of circuit analysis techniques
  • Familiarity with Ohm's Law
  • Ability to calculate node voltages in electrical circuits
NEXT STEPS
  • Study advanced applications of Kirchhoff's Laws in complex circuits
  • Learn about mesh analysis and its relation to KCL
  • Explore the use of simulation tools like LTspice for circuit analysis
  • Investigate the impact of voltage sources on current flow in circuits
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineering students, circuit designers, and anyone involved in analyzing or troubleshooting electrical circuits will benefit from this discussion.

ainster31
Messages
158
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



FEoNQ4I.png


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



sqMF18w.png


Here is what I don't understand: how can this circuit exist? If you look at the V2 node, there are 3 currents going in but none going out. Isn't this a contradiction? From what I've heard, you can arbitrarily draw current arrows and if the direction of the arrows is wrong, you'll just get a negative current. But don't you have to at least be consistent in the rotation? If you look at the bottom left mesh, the currents are going clockwise and then there is a current that is going counter-clockwise.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ainster31 said:
Here is what I don't understand: how can this circuit exist? If you look at the V2 node, there are 3 currents going in but none going out. Isn't this a contradiction? From what I've heard, you can arbitrarily draw current arrows and if the direction of the arrows is wrong, you'll just get a negative current. But don't you have to at least be consistent in the rotation? If you look at the bottom left mesh, the currents are going clockwise and then there is a current that is going counter-clockwise.

So long as you're consistent in writing the math according to your assumed currents, the math will always take care of itself and present you with the right values (positive or negative) for each.

In fact, when writing node equations it's actually easier to maintain consistency by always assuming that all currents are flowing either into or out of a given node. That way you never trip up by forgetting which one or ones you had going in and which ones going out. Later, if you need the value of a particular current, you use solved-for node voltages and Ohm's law for a given branch.
 
ainster31 said:
Here is what I don't understand: how can this circuit exist? If you look at the V2 node, there are 3 currents going in but none going out. Isn't this a contradiction?

No...there isn't any contradiction .The confusion clears as soon as you calculate V2 ,which you haven't .V2 = 62.89 V which means it is higher than both 60V and V1 .So,in reality a current of magnitude 0.29A flows from V2 to 60V across the 10Ω resistor and 4.90A from V2 to V1 across 2Ω resistor .

In other words at node V2 ,current of magnitude 5.19A enters whereas 0.29A and 4.90A leave .

It is your assumption that all currents are flowing into node V2.But in reality that is not the case .

Hope that helps
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K