Circular Motion and block track

AI Thread Summary
To determine the minimum height for a block to complete a circular loop on a frictionless track, conservation of energy principles are essential. The initial energy is expressed as gravitational potential energy, while the final energy at the top of the loop includes kinetic and potential energy. A critical factor is the minimum speed required at the top of the loop to maintain contact, which is not zero. This speed can be derived using Newton's second law by analyzing the forces acting on the block. Understanding these concepts is crucial for solving the problem effectively.
interxavier
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A frictionless track contains a circular section of radius R as shown. What is the minimum height at which a block must be started in order for it to go around the loop without falling off the track?

Homework Equations


V = r*w
Fr = m*v^2/r = m*r*ω^2


The Attempt at a Solution



I'm sorry I don't have the diagram but you can draw the equation yourselves. I'm considering using the conservation of energy in this problem, but I don't know if it's proper way.

So initially we have:
Ei = 1/2*m*v^2 + m*g*h = 0 + mgH
Ef = 1/2*m*v^2 + m*g*h = 0 + 2mgR
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In particular, you know that the block falls off the track if its speed drops to zero (I'd imagine), and that the speed of the block is the same whenever it's on a given height H.
 
interxavier said:
I'm considering using the conservation of energy in this problem, but I don't know if it's proper way.
You'll need conservation of energy, but that's not all.

The key to this problem is that there is a minimum speed at the top of the track below which the block will lose contact. (That speed is not zero.) To find that speed, analyze the forces acting and apply Newton's 2nd law.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top