Circular Motion: Constant Centripetal Force and Velocity

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion on circular motion, the relationship between centripetal force and gravitational forces at different points in a loop is examined. It is clarified that while centripetal acceleration can be constant, the forces acting on an object in vertical circular motion vary, with greater force required at the bottom to counteract gravity. The centripetal force is defined as the net force required for circular motion, which can differ based on the position in the loop, being greater at the bottom and potentially zero at the top. The tension in a rope, when swinging an object in a circular path, also varies, impacting the net force needed for circular motion. Ultimately, the centripetal force should not be labeled in a free body diagram as it represents a net force rather than an individual force acting on the object.
Jimmy87
Messages
692
Reaction score
19

Homework Statement


Assessing the required forces at the top and bottom of a loop de loop. I understand that you need a larger force at the bottom of the loop because you have to counter gravity. My question is, when you are undergoing uniform circular motion and your centripetal acceleration is constant then would your centripetal force also be constant?

If you have a loop de loop with a centripetal acceleration of 9.81m/s^2 then at the bottom the reaction force is 2mg which provides the centripetal force but at the top the weight provides the centripetal force which is only mg as the reaction force would be zero. But if v^2/r is constant then how can the centripetal force be different at the top and bottom?

Homework Equations


F = mv^2/r.

The Attempt at a Solution


Have listed my thoughts in the top section.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why do you assume constant speed? What is the effect of gravity on the motion around the loop?
 
Sorry, I meant to say that if we are purely considering uniform circular motion on a loop de loop where we have a centripetal acceleration of 9.81. Gravity acts against the centripetal force at the bottom but provides it at the top. I thought the reaction force provides the centripetal force at the bottom but then I don't get how the centripetal force can be greater at the bottom if the acceleration is constant? Or is the centripetal force not the whole force but just the net bit towards the centre?
 
How can you have uniform circular motion on a vertical loop? Do you consider some engine attached to the object moving around the loop?
The usual situation assumes a ball sliding freely around the loop. When it moves upwards it slows down, have a minimum velocity at the top and then accelerates again when it goes down.
So neither speed nor centripetal acceleration is constant for this motion.
 
Thanks for the reply. Ok forget that I see what you mean and take your point. What happens if you take a rope and a bucket with water in it. If you knew the radius and the mass then you could swing it with a constant velocity (v) such that the centripetal acceleration is 9.81 all the time. At the bottom the normal force from the bucket on the water would be 2mg and at the top it would be zero. Here the centripetal acceleration would be constant but wouldn't the force be greatest at the bottom?
 
Last edited:
nasu said:
How can you have uniform circular motion on a vertical loop? Do you consider some engine attached to the object moving around the loop?
The usual situation assumes a ball sliding freely around the loop. When it moves upwards it slows down, have a minimum velocity at the top and then accelerates again when it goes down.
So neither speed nor centripetal acceleration is constant for this motion.

Also, if the rollercoaster does indeed move at different speeds, would this strictly be non-uniform circular motion?
 
Ok, i see that you are really focused on constant speed. Then indeed the centripetal acceleration will be constant as well. And so will be the centripetal force. IF you can arrange this.
If you want the centripetal force to be equal with the weight of the ball, the reaction at the top will be zero. This is actully the limiting case for speed at the top. Any speed less than this will requir negative reaction force.
 
  • Like
Likes Jimmy87
nasu said:
Ok, i see that you are really focused on constant speed. Then indeed the centripetal acceleration will be constant as well. And so will be the centripetal force. IF you can arrange this.
If you want the centripetal force to be equal with the weight of the ball, the reaction at the top will be zero. This is actully the limiting case for speed at the top. Any speed less than this will requir negative reaction force.

Thanks nasu. So, in my example, am I correct in saying that the reaction force of the bucket at the bottom of the swing will be 2mg but the centripetal force at the bottom will be mg? What I am trying to get at - is the centripetal force just the net force towards the centre as appose to the total force towards the centre? And would this mean that you should never label a FBD with the centripetal force as it is a net force only?
 
Also is it only true that the magnitude of the centripetal acceleration and force is constant since the direction is changing?
 
  • #10
Jimmy87 said:
Thanks for the reply. Ok forget that I see what you and take your point. What happens if you take a rope and a bucket with water in it. If you knew the radius and the mass then you could swing it with a constant velocity (v) such that the centripetal acceleration is 9.81 all the time. At the bottom the normal force from the bucket on the water would be 2mg and at the top it would be zero. Here the centripetal acceleration would be constant but wouldn't the force be greatest at the bottom?

Correct. Centripetal force is the force required to cause the bucket to move in a circular path. It doesn't matter what other forces act on the bucket as long as the net force is mv^2/r.

There are two forces acting on the bucket.

1) The tension in the rope T which will vary
2) Gravity

In order to move in a circle the two components must sum to mv^2/r

Lets call the net force acting towards the center F

At the top

F = T + mg (they act in same direction)
For circular motion F must equal mv^2/r so
mv^2/r = T + mg
Rearrange to give a general equation for the tension..
T = mv^2/r - mg

If you then arrange for the velocity and radius to be such that mv^2/r = mg then T=0

At the bottom

F = T - mg (they act in opposite directions)
For circular motion F must = mv^2/r so
mv^2/r = T - mg
Rearrange to give a general equation for the tension..
T = mv^2/r + mg

If you then arrange for the velocity and radius to be such that mv^2/r = mg then T=2mg
So the tension in the string varies top to bottom but in both cases the net force F = mv^2/r
 
  • Like
Likes Jimmy87
  • #11
CWatters said:
Correct. Centripetal force is the force required to cause the bucket to move in a circular path. It doesn't matter what other forces act on the bucket as long as the net force is mv^2/r.

There are two forces acting on the bucket.

1) The tension in the rope T which will vary
2) Gravity

In order to move in a circle the two components must sum to mv^2/r

Lets call the net force acting towards the center F

At the top

F = T + mg (they act in same direction)
For circular motion F must equal mv^2/r so
mv^2/r = T + mg
Rearrange to give a general equation for the tension..
T = mv^2/r - mg

If you then arrange for the velocity and radius to be such that mv^2/r = mg then T=0

At the bottom

F = T - mg (they act in opposite directions)
For circular motion F must = mv^2/r so
mv^2/r = T - mg
Rearrange to give a general equation for the tension..
T = mv^2/r + mg

If you then arrange for the velocity and radius to be such that mv^2/r = mg then T=2mg
So the tension in the string varies top to bottom but in both cases the net force F = mv^2/r

Perfect, thank you very much, that makes complete sense. So in the situation I described where you try to keep the velocity at a particular constant value such that the centripetal acceleration is always 9.81 then the magnitude of the centripetal force will be mg at every point around the circle? Is that right? Also, since the centripetal force is a net force is it wrong to label it in a FBD?
 
Back
Top