Circular motion: net work after one period

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the net work done on a child on a merry-go-round after one complete rotation. Although initial calculations suggest a significant amount of work, it is clarified that the net work is actually zero. This is because the centripetal force acting on the child is always perpendicular to the displacement during uniform circular motion. Consequently, the scalar product of force and displacement results in zero work done. Thus, the net work after one full rotation is confirmed to be 0 Joules.
nx01
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



"A 40 kg child sitting 6.0 m from the center of a merry-go-round has a constant speed of 6.0 m/s. The net work (in Joules) done on the child after making one complete circle on the merry-go-round is?"

Homework Equations



a=V^2/r
F=ma
C=2pi*r

The Attempt at a Solution



C ≈ 37.7 m
a = 6 m/s
F at a point = (40)(6) = 240 N
Net work ≈ (240)(37.7) ≈ 9048 J

My question is, is the net work actually 0 J after one full rotation on the merry-go-round, since force is a vector quantity, and the force in one-half of the circular motion negates the force in the other half for each point?

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are right and you are wrong... the work is indeed zero, but actually not only on a full rounf, every time... indeed the work is the scalar product of the force times the displacement vector... and in an uniform circular motion the acceleration (and hence the force) is the centripetal one only, and is perpendicular ALWAYS to the displacement, so that the scalar product is identically zero
 
Thank you :)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top