Circular Motion: Tension in String w/ Bob Weight

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the dynamics of a pendulum bob undergoing circular motion after striking a rod. It is established that the tension in the string at the lowest point must exceed twice the weight of the bob due to the necessity for greater centripetal force. The conversation highlights the conversion of kinetic energy to potential energy as the bob rises, indicating that the motion is non-uniform. Participants seek to quantify kinetic and potential energy changes in terms of mass, gravitational acceleration, and radius. The overall conclusion emphasizes the complexity of the motion and the need for further calculations to fully understand the forces involved.
Jimmy87
Messages
692
Reaction score
19

Homework Statement



A pendulum with a bob on the end is attached to a stand. The stand has a rod sticking out such that when the string of the pendulum strikes it, it starts to undergo circular motion. Consider the bob being released from a height such that when it strikes the rod, it only just manages to complete one rotation (i.e. any smaller height and it would fail to complete a full rotation). If the tension in the string it zero when it is at its highest point discuss, without calculation, the tension in the string at its lowest point in terms of the weight of the bob.

Homework Equations


ac = v^2/r

The Attempt at a Solution



I would say that the tension in the string for question two must be higher than twice the weight. This is because the centripetal force at the top is mg if the bob is weightless. Assuming it remained at mg would mean that the centripetal force would be twice mg at the bottom. However, using conservation of energy, the bob must have more kinetic energy at the bottom and therefore more velocity and therefore a greater centripetal force than 2mg. So in conclusion this is not circular motion hence Fc at the bottom is more than 2mg, is that right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As the bob rises some of its K.E. is converted into potential energy. You may be able to quantify this.
 
In terms of mg and r, what is the kinetic energy at the top of the arc? What is the kinetic energy at the bottom of the arc? What is v2/r at the bottom of the arc?

Chet
 
NascentOxygen said:
As the bob rises some of its K.E. is converted into potential energy. You may be able to quantify this.

If the kinetic energy is changing does this mean that this will be non-uniform circular motion?
 
The bob is continually slowing as it rises, but predictably.
 
NascentOxygen said:
The bob is continually slowing as it rises, but predictably.

If it is continually slowing does this mean the circular motion is non-uniform?
 
Jimmy87 said:
If it is continually slowing does this mean the circular motion is non-uniform?
Yes, it does mean that.
 
Chestermiller said:
In terms of mg and r, what is the kinetic energy at the top of the arc? What is the kinetic energy at the bottom of the arc? What is v2/r at the bottom of the arc?

Chet
I have no idea how to do that in terms of m, g and r. Could you give some guidance? Thanks
 
Jimmy87 said:
I have no idea how to do that in terms of m, g and r. Could you give some guidance? Thanks
Well, if, as you said, ##m\frac{v^2}{r}=mg##, then what is ##m\frac{v^2}{2}## equal to? What is the change in potential energy between the top and bottom of the arc? What is the change in kinetic energy between the top and bottom of the arc?

Chet
 
Back
Top