Admissions Citations and References in Statement of Purpose

AI Thread Summary
When applying for physics PhD programs, including citations in your statement of purpose can be a nuanced decision. While some believe it's unnecessary to cite research already known to the committee, others argue that it can demonstrate genuine interest and engagement with the field. Faculty members may not be fully aware of all research within their department, as they often have limited familiarity with the work of their colleagues. Therefore, citing specific experiments or papers can help convey a candidate's dedication and understanding, but it must be done thoughtfully to avoid appearing insincere. Additionally, the application process can be hindered by systems that strip formatting from statements, complicating how candidates present their work and interests.
thisisphysics
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Hey! Applying for physics PhD programs this fall and thinking about my statement. There's some really specific experiments/work being done I'm interested in. Is it acceptable if I put a few citations down? Such as: "I'm really in interested in tests of yada yada[1] and experiments such as blah blah[2]." I looked it up online and there's no consensus really on what's best. Hopefully y'all have more insight!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Usually the purpose of citations is to direct the reader to a source of additional information. If you're talking about research already happening at the university you're applying to, the committee members will already be familiar, so I'm not sure there's a need for citations.

As a side note, some grad school apps have a REALLY annoying system where they require you to paste your statement of purpose into a text box, and not upload a PDF. So you'll lose all formatting there anyway.
 
  • Like
Likes thisisphysics
I'm always impressed by students who have read my papers and know which papers inspired my work.

But my BS detector is pretty good to, and I can usually tell if students are blowing smoke.
 
  • Like
Likes boneh3ad
Thank you all! This is very helpful.
 
Dishsoap said:
If you're talking about research already happening at the university you're applying to, the committee members will already be familiar, so I'm not sure there's a need for citations.

This just tells me you haven't spent any time as a faculty member. I'd say that the average faculty member probably has a cursory understanding of the the work of maybe 50-75% of the research groups in in their own department, and has a more solid grasp on maybe 25-50%. Academic researchers are often living in silos.

I do fluid mechanics research. One of the prominent fluids faculty in my own department hadn't even seen or shown interest in seeing my new wind tunnel until he got word that the university president was visiting, at which point he showed up to learn more about what I was doing.

Dr. Courtney said:
But my BS detector is pretty good to, and I can usually tell if students are blowing smoke.

This is a pretty important point. If you are citing a professor's work, they are obviously very familiar with it and can usually tell pretty easily whether you actually read the paper or just skimmed it.
 
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Replies
49
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
29
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top