Admissions Citations and References in Statement of Purpose

AI Thread Summary
When applying for physics PhD programs, including citations in your statement of purpose can be a nuanced decision. While some believe it's unnecessary to cite research already known to the committee, others argue that it can demonstrate genuine interest and engagement with the field. Faculty members may not be fully aware of all research within their department, as they often have limited familiarity with the work of their colleagues. Therefore, citing specific experiments or papers can help convey a candidate's dedication and understanding, but it must be done thoughtfully to avoid appearing insincere. Additionally, the application process can be hindered by systems that strip formatting from statements, complicating how candidates present their work and interests.
thisisphysics
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Hey! Applying for physics PhD programs this fall and thinking about my statement. There's some really specific experiments/work being done I'm interested in. Is it acceptable if I put a few citations down? Such as: "I'm really in interested in tests of yada yada[1] and experiments such as blah blah[2]." I looked it up online and there's no consensus really on what's best. Hopefully y'all have more insight!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Usually the purpose of citations is to direct the reader to a source of additional information. If you're talking about research already happening at the university you're applying to, the committee members will already be familiar, so I'm not sure there's a need for citations.

As a side note, some grad school apps have a REALLY annoying system where they require you to paste your statement of purpose into a text box, and not upload a PDF. So you'll lose all formatting there anyway.
 
  • Like
Likes thisisphysics
I'm always impressed by students who have read my papers and know which papers inspired my work.

But my BS detector is pretty good to, and I can usually tell if students are blowing smoke.
 
  • Like
Likes boneh3ad
Thank you all! This is very helpful.
 
Dishsoap said:
If you're talking about research already happening at the university you're applying to, the committee members will already be familiar, so I'm not sure there's a need for citations.

This just tells me you haven't spent any time as a faculty member. I'd say that the average faculty member probably has a cursory understanding of the the work of maybe 50-75% of the research groups in in their own department, and has a more solid grasp on maybe 25-50%. Academic researchers are often living in silos.

I do fluid mechanics research. One of the prominent fluids faculty in my own department hadn't even seen or shown interest in seeing my new wind tunnel until he got word that the university president was visiting, at which point he showed up to learn more about what I was doing.

Dr. Courtney said:
But my BS detector is pretty good to, and I can usually tell if students are blowing smoke.

This is a pretty important point. If you are citing a professor's work, they are obviously very familiar with it and can usually tell pretty easily whether you actually read the paper or just skimmed it.
 
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Hello, I’m an undergraduate student pursuing degrees in both computer science and physics. I was wondering if anyone here has graduated with these degrees and applied to a physics graduate program. I’m curious about how graduate programs evaluated your applications. In addition, if I’m interested in doing research in quantum fields related to materials or computational physics, what kinds of undergraduate research experiences would be most valuable?

Similar threads

Replies
49
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
29
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top