Clarification of Permuatation Question

  • Thread starter Thread starter Redhead711
  • Start date Start date
Redhead711
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
NEED HELP! with permutation proof

Sorry for any confusion the question I have is:

Show that a permutation with odd order must be an even permutation.

The order of a permutation of a finite set written in disjoint cycle form
is the least common multiple of the lengths of the cycles.

This is what I have worked out so far:

Let e = epsilon
Let B = a permutation
Let k = any integer

Now say B^(2k+1) = e. Where B^(2k+1) is an odd permutation.
Then B^(2k)= B^(-1).
But B^(2k) = B^(k)^2 is even.

I would really appreciate some help in putting this
proof together in a more coherent fashion.
I am very confused. Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
More important than that surely is the definition of the sign (even or odd) at no point do you use its properties so surely something must be telling you you need some more details.

sign is multiplicative: sign(xy)=sign(x)sign(y)

so it suffices to show that an element of odd order cannot possesses any cycles of odd sign (when written as of disjoint cycles), which is where you're order being the lcm comes in
 
Thanks to Matt for all your help. I understand the problem better know and have been able to solve it. I'm very grateful
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top