Clarification on heat propagation

  • Thread starter Thread starter feynman137
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Heat Propagation
AI Thread Summary
Heat propagation is governed by the diffusion equation, which is deterministic and can be integrated both forwards and backwards in time. The statement suggesting heat propagation is semi-deterministic is challenged, as small perturbations grow when integrating backwards, highlighting the stability of solutions. Temperature is fundamentally a statistical quantity related to the mean energy of particles in a system, emphasizing its dependence on irregular motion. The heat equation is causal, meaning it describes the evolution of temperature based on prior states, adhering to the principle of causality and the directed nature of time. Thus, heat propagation does not violate the determinacy and reversibility of classical mechanics.
feynman137
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Could you possibly comment the following statement:

'Heat propagation is a semi-deterministic process in that its future is determined by its present but not by its past.'

Is heat propagation a violation of the determinacy and reversibility of the laws of classical mechanics? Thanks
 
Science news on Phys.org
I disagree with the statement. Heat propagation is governed by the diffusion equation, ∇2T = κ ∂T/∂t. This equation is deterministic and can be integrated backwards forwards in time just as easily. The true statement has to do with its stability. When integrating backwards in time, small perturbations will grow and dominate the solution.
 
Temperature itself is, seen from a fundamental point of view, a statistical quantity. It describes the part of the mean energy of a particle within a many-body system (fluid or solid) which is due to it's irregular motion in the local rest frame of the bulk medium.

The heat equation is, as any physical equation that describes the time evolution of systems, causal, i.e., it describes the evolution of a quantity (or several quantities if you have a coupled set of equations like Maxwell's Equations for electromagnetism), given the history of the quantity (or quantities) at times prior to the time in question. BTW: It is important to note that by definition, time is a directed quantity, i.e., the causality principle defines a "fundamental arrow of time", from which also other "arrows of time" may follow, e.g., the "thermodynamical arrow of time" according to Boltzmann's H theorem.

Very often, and for sure on the fundamental level, the equations are not only causal but even local in time, i.e., one doesn't have to know the whole history of the system prior to the time under consideration, but it is sufficient to know the state of the system at one point in time in the past. That's also true for the heat equation: If you know the temperature field at one point in time and appropriate boundary conditions, it provides a unique solution for the temperature field within the body at any later time.
 
I need to calculate the amount of water condensed from a DX cooling coil per hour given the size of the expansion coil (the total condensing surface area), the incoming air temperature, the amount of air flow from the fan, the BTU capacity of the compressor and the incoming air humidity. There are lots of condenser calculators around but they all need the air flow and incoming and outgoing humidity and then give a total volume of condensed water but I need more than that. The size of the...
Thread 'Why work is PdV and not (P+dP)dV in an isothermal process?'
Let's say we have a cylinder of volume V1 with a frictionless movable piston and some gas trapped inside with pressure P1 and temperature T1. On top of the piston lay some small pebbles that add weight and essentially create the pressure P1. Also the system is inside a reservoir of water that keeps its temperature constant at T1. The system is in equilibrium at V1, P1, T1. Now let's say i put another very small pebble on top of the piston (0,00001kg) and after some seconds the system...
I was watching a Khan Academy video on entropy called: Reconciling thermodynamic and state definitions of entropy. So in the video it says: Let's say I have a container. And in that container, I have gas particles and they're bouncing around like gas particles tend to do, creating some pressure on the container of a certain volume. And let's say I have n particles. Now, each of these particles could be in x different states. Now, if each of them can be in x different states, how many total...
Back
Top