Clarification on heat propagation

  • Thread starter Thread starter feynman137
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Heat Propagation
Click For Summary
Heat propagation is governed by the diffusion equation, which is deterministic and can be integrated both forwards and backwards in time. The statement suggesting heat propagation is semi-deterministic is challenged, as small perturbations grow when integrating backwards, highlighting the stability of solutions. Temperature is fundamentally a statistical quantity related to the mean energy of particles in a system, emphasizing its dependence on irregular motion. The heat equation is causal, meaning it describes the evolution of temperature based on prior states, adhering to the principle of causality and the directed nature of time. Thus, heat propagation does not violate the determinacy and reversibility of classical mechanics.
feynman137
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Could you possibly comment the following statement:

'Heat propagation is a semi-deterministic process in that its future is determined by its present but not by its past.'

Is heat propagation a violation of the determinacy and reversibility of the laws of classical mechanics? Thanks
 
Science news on Phys.org
I disagree with the statement. Heat propagation is governed by the diffusion equation, ∇2T = κ ∂T/∂t. This equation is deterministic and can be integrated backwards forwards in time just as easily. The true statement has to do with its stability. When integrating backwards in time, small perturbations will grow and dominate the solution.
 
Temperature itself is, seen from a fundamental point of view, a statistical quantity. It describes the part of the mean energy of a particle within a many-body system (fluid or solid) which is due to it's irregular motion in the local rest frame of the bulk medium.

The heat equation is, as any physical equation that describes the time evolution of systems, causal, i.e., it describes the evolution of a quantity (or several quantities if you have a coupled set of equations like Maxwell's Equations for electromagnetism), given the history of the quantity (or quantities) at times prior to the time in question. BTW: It is important to note that by definition, time is a directed quantity, i.e., the causality principle defines a "fundamental arrow of time", from which also other "arrows of time" may follow, e.g., the "thermodynamical arrow of time" according to Boltzmann's H theorem.

Very often, and for sure on the fundamental level, the equations are not only causal but even local in time, i.e., one doesn't have to know the whole history of the system prior to the time under consideration, but it is sufficient to know the state of the system at one point in time in the past. That's also true for the heat equation: If you know the temperature field at one point in time and appropriate boundary conditions, it provides a unique solution for the temperature field within the body at any later time.
 
Thread 'Can somebody explain this: Planck's Law in action'
Plotted is the Irradiance over Wavelength. Please check for logarithmic scaling. As you can see, there are 4 curves. Blue AM 0 as measured yellow Planck for 5777 K green Planck for, 5777 K after free space expansion red Planck for 1.000.000 K To me the idea of a gamma-Ray-source on earth, below the magnetic field, which protects life on earth from solar radiation, in an intensity, which is way way way outer hand, makes no sense to me. If they really get these high temperatures realized in...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
8K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K