Clarification Regarding the conditions for STP

  • Thread starter Thread starter Conservation
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conditions
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the definitions of Standard Temperature and Pressure (STP) as presented in two chemistry textbooks: Changs and Atkins. Changs defines STP as 25 degrees Celsius and 1 atm, while Atkins uses 25 degrees Celsius and 1 bar. Although the numerical difference between 1 atm and 1 bar is minimal, the conversation highlights that there is no universally accepted definition of STP. The bar is now recommended as the standard pressure, reflecting a shift from the long-standing use of atmospheres. The IUPAC gold book is referenced for further clarification on this topic.
Conservation
Messages
63
Reaction score
0
Hello all,

I am currently in possession of two chemistry textbooks, Changs and Atkins, which I believe are both fairly new versions. Changs defines STP at 25 degrees Celsius and 1 atm, and Atkins defines STP at 25 degrees Celsius and 1 bar; I understand that numerically it would not make a huge difference (1 atm=101.3 kpa=almost 100 kpa), but which is technically correct?

Thanks.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
There is no one, universally accepted definition of STP. Bar is a recommended pressure for a standard state.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Atmospheres were used for something like 100 years until "they" decided to switch standard pressure to 1 bar. Numerically they are nearly identical, obviously.

Ref: http://goldbook.iupac.org/S05921.html
(Getting a lot of mileage out of IUPAC today :smile:)
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top