Studying Clarifying with authors of textbooks.

  • Thread starter Thread starter nascentmind
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Authors Textbooks
AI Thread Summary
Clarifying doubts directly with textbook authors, particularly professors, can be beneficial but may depend on the nature of the inquiry. Authors generally appreciate feedback on typographical errors and conceptual misunderstandings, especially if the feedback is constructive. For self-studying individuals, it is often recommended to first seek clarification from professors or peers before approaching authors. Engaging with forum members can also provide insights into conceptual issues. If a mistake is identified, authors typically welcome such notifications, as they may include corrections in textbook errata. However, it's essential to ensure that any doubts raised are well-founded to avoid miscommunication.
nascentmind
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Is it a good idea to clarify doubts in a textbook with the authors themselves? These authors are generally professors in universities. Would they find it offensive?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What doubts are you talking about?? You mean typo's in the textbook? I'm sure that the authors would like you to tell them about typo's in the book...
 
If it's a conceptual misunderstanding it's probably best to ask your professors about it first.
 
I want to know of conceptual misunderstandings. I am not in any university but self studying.

I have alerted authors of mistakes in their books and clarified some doubts but none of them were professors but people working in the industry.
 
If it's a conceptual misunderstanding, then it's best to ask people on this forum about it. Maybe they can clarify it for you. And if it turns out to be a mistake of the author, then I think it's ok if you tell the author about it...
 
Lots of professors appreciate such clarifications - they put those clarifications in their textbook errata.

That being said - just make sure that you aren't wrong. :p
 
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...

Similar threads

Replies
26
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
674
Replies
102
Views
5K
Back
Top