Class 1 Lever Experiment: Wrong results

Click For Summary
The experiment using a 30 cm ruler as a lever did not yield results that matched the theoretical equation due to several factors affecting the measurements. Key issues include the need to accurately measure distances from the fulcrum rather than simply using ruler markings, which can lead to discrepancies in calculating load arm and effort distance. Additionally, the weight of the ruler itself must be considered if not using the midpoint as the fulcrum, complicating calculations. Variations in ruler length, particularly in different measurement systems, can also introduce errors. Properly accounting for these factors is essential for achieving results that align with theoretical expectations.
SkyStinger
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hey guys, I really need help with this, I do not understand what I did wrong in this experiment.

I had a 30 cm ruler as a beam and some weights of 50 grams, 5 grams and 25 grams. I had a fulcrum which was 17 cm high. As you can see I only have measurements in 50, 5 and 25 grams. So I cut out some random paper, scrunched them into balls to make my lever balance at different lengths.

However, the results the made my lever balance did not match the results I got from the equation:

Effort force = Load force x load arm / effort distance.

Could someone please tell some factors that affected my experiment results and why it didn't match the equation.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The equation assumes ideal circumstances. A real experiment is rarely so simple. You should be able to come up with some ways that the experiment doesn't match the ideal model.
 
Khashishi said:
The equation assumes ideal circumstances. A real experiment is rarely so simple. You should be able to come up with some ways that the experiment doesn't match the ideal model.

Agreed, but what are the factors that makes it not ideal?
 
Sorry if this is a really obvious suggestion but...

Rulers have zero at one end, not at the fulcrum. So when you worked out the "load arm" and "effort distance" did you calculate the distance from the fulcrum or just write down the number on the ruler?
 
Actually, you can take moments about any point. But if you don't take the mid(balance ) point of the ruler, you have to include the weight of the ruler and the calculation is more long winded. For an easier result, you must do as CWatters suggests and relate everything to the mid point. You need to take your distance measurements carefully if you want your sums to 'balance' too.
 
A "30 cm ruler" in the U.S. is very likely 12 inches long -- 30.48 cm. If you were to use the 15 cm marker as the nominal midpoint then your measured moment arms would all be off by 0.24 cm. If you were to use the 15 cm marker as the fulcrum then you would have an additional 0.48 cm of ruler unaccounted-for at one end.
 
For simple comparison, I think the same thought process can be followed as a block slides down a hill, - for block down hill, simple starting PE of mgh to final max KE 0.5mv^2 - comparing PE1 to max KE2 would result in finding the work friction did through the process. efficiency is just 100*KE2/PE1. If a mousetrap car travels along a flat surface, a starting PE of 0.5 k th^2 can be measured and maximum velocity of the car can also be measured. If energy efficiency is defined by...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K