Schools Classes to take to prepare for physics education grad school

AI Thread Summary
When considering advanced courses in physics versus education for a physics education major, the discussion highlights the importance of aligning coursework with career goals. Taking advanced physics courses, such as quantum mechanics or electrodynamics, may enhance understanding of fundamental concepts, beneficial for guiding aspiring physicists. However, the relevance of these courses to teaching at the introductory level is questioned. The preference for education-focused courses, including psychology, is emphasized for improving teaching effectiveness and enhancing resume appeal for secondary education roles. Concerns about the competitive nature of physics research and grant acquisition are noted, with a clear inclination towards classroom teaching over lab work. The possibility of teaching at the community college level is also raised as a viable career path, suggesting a focus on educational roles rather than research-intensive positions. Overall, the conversation underscores the need to balance advanced physics knowledge with pedagogical skills to effectively prepare for a teaching career in physics education.
SpdOfLiteSqrd
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Would you guys suggest taking more advanced courses in physics or education for a junior and senior course load to prepare for grad school when you're majoring in physics education post undergrad?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Greg Bernhardt said:
What are the pros and cons that you've identified?
The truth be told I'm not sure how a second course in quantum mechanics or a third in electrodynamics will fir to my skill set when I want to teach at the intro level. Also debating just going for straight physics but really don't see myself adapting well the the grind of acquiring grants and doing research. I want to focus on how to best educate my students and guide other professors on how to do the same. At the same time, I see that experiencing a vast sum of our knowledge of the basic mechanics will help me guide students who want to be physicists better. My research is also education based and diving into psychology will push my resume as an instructor more in the kinds of 9th secondaries I'm looking at. But a part of me wants to give full fledged physics a chance but yeah, jobs are scarce, and astrophysics is the only way I see myself enjoying the lab and I don't have a lot of credits beyond intermediate stellar structure courses. Jzust a cluster **** of don't know what to specialize in. Advisor I'd giving good insight but I need other opinions. Bottom line, I love the classroom more than the lab. So that's where my conversation should start.
 
Do you think teaching at the community college level is still an option?
 
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
953
Replies
16
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Back
Top