Classical Mechanics by Kibble Berkshire

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the suitability of a specific classical mechanics book, often referred to as K&K, for beginners. While it is used at prestigious institutions like Imperial College London, it is not considered an introductory text. Reviews suggest that it is aimed at graduate or advanced senior-undergraduate students, making it too abstract for those new to upper-division classical mechanics. Participants agree that it should not replace foundational texts such as Halliday/Resnick or Kleppner/Kolenkow, which are more appropriate for first-year physics students. Overall, K&K is recognized for its depth but is deemed less suitable for beginners.
tridianprime
Messages
102
Reaction score
3
I was recommended this by a friend. I'm going to get K&K but I was wondering what you thought of this book if you have read it. Is it good for beginners? Comprehensive? General comments?

Thank you,

Tridian
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Has anyone read it? Is it not very commonly used? It is used in Imperial College London where Kibble works and ICL is one if the top in the country so does that say anything?
 
I've never read it, but judging from the reviews on Amazon:

https://www.amazon.com/dp/1860944353/?tag=pfamazon01-20

it's not an introductory book, but rather intended for graduate or advanced senior-undergraduate level.

This is basically the most abstract classical mechanics book at the senior undergraduate level. While there are merits to this abstractness, it's not the best book to use when you're first starting to learn upper-division CM.

this book is not an introductory college text or anything equivalent

I would not consider it as a substitute for Halliday/Resnick or similar first-year physics textbooks, or even Kleppner/Kolenkow. Note that "upper-division CM" in the first quote refers to books on the level of Marion/Thornton or Fowles/Cassiday, which are commonly used for junior/senior year undergraduate CM courses.
 
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top