Classical Tunneling: Instantons Explained

scariari
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Im learning about quantum tunneling and read something about that there are classical solutions at imaginary times, so called instantons? Can anyone help me out with this connection?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is not easy, and maybe should be delayed until you have actually gone beyond QM, and learned a good deal of QFT.

When they say "imaginary times" it refers to the fact that those solutions are calculated in Euclidean spacetime : this is just ordinary metric 4-dim space. This is NOT Minkowski space, which is the usual way to think about vacuum (at least in classical terms).

Do you know what a soliton is ?
A soliton typically interpolates between different vacua at infinity.
http://www.maths.surrey.ac.uk/research/Geom/sg.gif
they can go through each other.
Now imagine there is only one of those around : at infinity on the left, there is not the same winding number than at infinity on the right.
An instanton is just a soliton in 4-dim space.
Actually, instantons change the winding number of the vacuum too. It is just less easy to picture in the case.

The reason we call this a tunnel effect, is that there is an energy barrier between the two vacua states.
 
and by the way : the avatar I am using is the formula which gives the winding number of the F field :smile:
 
humanino said:
When they say "imaginary times" it refers to the fact that those solutions are calculated in Euclidean spacetime : this is just ordinary metric 4-dim space. This is NOT Minkowski space, which is the usual way to think about vacuum (at least in classical terms).
You mean where ds^2 = dx^2 + dy^2 + dz^2 + dt^2?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
349
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top