Classical Tunneling: Instantons Explained

scariari
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Im learning about quantum tunneling and read something about that there are classical solutions at imaginary times, so called instantons? Can anyone help me out with this connection?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is not easy, and maybe should be delayed until you have actually gone beyond QM, and learned a good deal of QFT.

When they say "imaginary times" it refers to the fact that those solutions are calculated in Euclidean spacetime : this is just ordinary metric 4-dim space. This is NOT Minkowski space, which is the usual way to think about vacuum (at least in classical terms).

Do you know what a soliton is ?
A soliton typically interpolates between different vacua at infinity.
http://www.maths.surrey.ac.uk/research/Geom/sg.gif
they can go through each other.
Now imagine there is only one of those around : at infinity on the left, there is not the same winding number than at infinity on the right.
An instanton is just a soliton in 4-dim space.
Actually, instantons change the winding number of the vacuum too. It is just less easy to picture in the case.

The reason we call this a tunnel effect, is that there is an energy barrier between the two vacua states.
 
and by the way : the avatar I am using is the formula which gives the winding number of the F field :smile:
 
humanino said:
When they say "imaginary times" it refers to the fact that those solutions are calculated in Euclidean spacetime : this is just ordinary metric 4-dim space. This is NOT Minkowski space, which is the usual way to think about vacuum (at least in classical terms).
You mean where ds^2 = dx^2 + dy^2 + dz^2 + dt^2?
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
438
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top