Classification of Subatomic Particles: Groups & Examples

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ali Asadullah
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Particles
Ali Asadullah
Messages
99
Reaction score
0
Can anyone please post a table about classification of subatomic particles showing that subatomic particles are divided in that number of groups which are further divided in other groups.
Also please send the examples of each group or subgroup.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This kind of information is easily found on the web. For example:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_Model"
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/particles/parcon.html"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Why is there such a difference between the total cross-section data? (simulation vs. experiment)'

Thread 'Why is there such a difference between the total cross-section data? (simulation vs. experiment)'

Well, I'm simulating a neutron-proton scattering phase shift. The equation that I solve numerically is the Phase function method and is $$ \frac{d}{dr}[\delta_{i+1}] = \frac{2\mu}{\hbar^2}\frac{V(r)}{k^2}\sin(kr + \delta_i)$$ ##\delta_i## is the phase shift for triplet and singlet state, ##\mu## is the reduced mass for neutron-proton, ##k=\sqrt{2\mu E_{cm}/\hbar^2}## is the wave number and ##V(r)## is the potential of interaction like Yukawa, Wood-Saxon, Square well potential, etc. I first...
View full post »

Thread 'Toponium Discovered'

Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
View full post »

Thread 'Dirac-Delta from Normalization of Continuous Eigenfunctions'

I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
View full post »

Similar threads

A question about wave/particle duality
Replies
5
Views
2K
B Matter/antimatter hybrid atomic structures?
Replies
21
Views
4K
I How Does Beta Decay Relate to the Role of W Bosons in Weak Nuclear Force?
Replies
4
Views
4K
I What would a hypothetical quark-quark collision yield?
Replies
4
Views
3K
I The SO(3) group in Group Theory
Replies
5
Views
3K
I New QCD Parameter Determinations
Replies
3
Views
2K
What Gives Mass to the Higgs Boson and Photons?
Replies
19
Views
4K
A Classification of reductive groups via root datum
Replies
3
Views
2K
B Fundamental particles and mass quantization
Replies
13
Views
3K
Gravitational forces between subatomic particles
Replies
5
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top