Classification of Three-Dimensional Forces/Vectors

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ynos
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Classification
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the classification of three-dimensional forces and vectors, particularly in the context of engineering education. Participants explore the definitions, types, and classifications of these concepts, with a focus on their relevance in classical mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses difficulty in finding classifications of three-dimensional forces or vectors, seeking guidance from others.
  • Another participant suggests that the only classification of forces is the four fundamental forces: Gravity, Electromagnetism, and the Strong/Weak interactions, noting that in engineering, forces are often simplified.
  • A participant questions the relationship between three-dimensional forces and three-dimensional vectors, acknowledging that force is a vector quantity.
  • Some participants mention polar and axial vectors, indicating that these classifications exist but do not clarify their connection to three-dimensional forces.
  • Another participant lists various types of forces encountered in engineering, such as compression, tension, and centripetal forces, but does not explicitly connect them to three-dimensional classifications.
  • One participant expresses confusion about the professor's expectations and the lack of clear definitions or examples in their reference materials.
  • There is a suggestion that classification schemes may not be important, but understanding the terms provided is essential.
  • Another participant clarifies that any three-dimensional vector is either polar or axial, with three-dimensional forces being categorized as polar vectors.
  • One participant reflects on the definitions of polar and axial vectors, noting that polar vectors have a point of application while axial vectors relate to rotational effects.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding regarding the classification of three-dimensional forces and vectors. There is no consensus on the existence of specific classifications beyond the fundamental forces, and some participants remain uncertain about the relationship between these concepts.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations in their reference materials and the ambiguity in their professor's instructions, which may affect their understanding of the topic.

ynos
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi, I am an Engineering Student and my professor is insisting that we read about the different types and classifications of three-dimensional forces. I have been scouring the world wide web for more than 3 days now, even checked physics books but I can't find even one type or classification of 3-dimensional force/vector.

Can anyone please point me to the right direction?

TIA!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The only classification that exists is the four fundamental forces: Gravity, Electromagnetism and the Strong/Weak interaction. In engineering you'll only ever encounter two of these, and even then you really just look at things in a classical view where forces are just kind of simplified abstractions.

The high school definition "a force is a push or a pull" will do fine for your needs I imagine. A more technical definition is a force is the gradient of any scalar potential field.
 
Thanks Dipole for the reply.

I am just confused, is three-dimensional forces the same with three-dimensional vectors?Because, if I understand it correctly, force is a vector quantity.

Based on what you said, there are only four fundamental classification of forces, how about classifications and types of three-dimensional vectors?

Thanks again in advance!
 
Vectors can be polar and axial. You can find details on the web.
 
@voko, I did a quick search on polar and axial vectors and I can't find the relationship of these two with the three-dimensional forces/vectors. It would be greatly appreciated if you could please expound on this.

@dipole, I also did some search regarding the classifications that you mentioned, and it turns out that those four are the only forces in nature, so they can be 1-dimensional, 2-dimensional, 3 or more dimensional forces.

I am still in the dark with the types and classifications of three-dimensional forces/vectors if they even exists.

TIA!
 
Searching Category:Force on wikipedia will yield an extensive list.

Like dipole said the only canonical classification of forces is the four fundamental interactions.

Common engineering terminology includes: compression and tension forces in statics; centripetal, centrifugal, and Coriolis forces in dynamics; pressure, viscous, and capillary forces in fluid mechanics; and shear and normal forces in continuum mechanics.
 
Well I am not sure what your professor meant, perhaps you could tell us more about which class this was in?

Meanwhile you might like to look up direct, inertial, body, normal, tangential, tensile, compressive, shear and impulsive forces.
 
Actually, I am lost myself. We were only told to research on vectors and three-dimensional forces/vectors and site examples of each type and/or classifications. If I am not mistaken our physics class as of now is more on classical mechanics as we've been touching force (resultant forces), acceleration, Newton's second law of motion, motion and changing velocity, circular motions, coplanar forces, etc.

I even found the suggested reference book - College Physics (2007) by Giambattista et al and still can't find any mention of the types and/or classification of three-dimensional forces/vectors.

It seems like I hit a wall here as I have no idea what to read or research that's why I seek the advise of the experienced and knowledgeable minds of this forum.

TIA!
 
Last edited:
Classification schemes, by themselves are not important.

But have you looked up the terms that have been provided and do you now understand them?
 
  • #10
ynos said:
@voko, I did a quick search on polar and axial vectors and I can't find the relationship of these two with the three-dimensional forces/vectors. It would be greatly appreciated if you could please expound on this.

The relationship is most direct: any 3D vector is either polar or axial. Any 3D force is a polar vector.
 
  • #11
Studiot said:
Classification schemes, by themselves are not important.

But have you looked up the terms that have been provided and do you now understand them?

That's the reason why I am at lost right now. There are no terms provided, except for the following: a) vectors and 3-dimensional forces, b) types and classifications of three-dimensional forces/vectors and site examples of each.

It seems to me now that there are no types or classification of three-dimensional forces/vectors.
 
  • #12
voko said:
The relationship is most direct: any 3D vector is either polar or axial. Any 3D force is a polar vector.

what I meant to say is relationship of polar and axial with the types and/or classification of three-dimensional forces.

As per a quick search and as per my understanding, polar vectors are those which have a starting point or point of application like displacement, so it doesn't necessarily mean that it is three dimensional, it can also be 2 dimensional, while axial vectors are those that have rotation or something of similar effect.

Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
12K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K