A Classifying quarks and leptons using LCTs representation

Mich24
Messages
5
Reaction score
2
TL;DR Summary
About the way of classifying quarks and leptons using linear canonical transformations spin representation.
Hello everyone, I would like to ask for opinions/expertises about the way of classifying quarks and leptons using linear canonical transformations spin representation as explainedin this link https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linear_canonical_transformation
Are the statements true ?
Please find attached a picture from the link that gives some description.
Thank you in Advance
 

Attachments

  • QuarksandleptonsLCT.png
    QuarksandleptonsLCT.png
    55.5 KB · Views: 60
Physics news on Phys.org
This is some kind of speculative unified theory... There are innumerable examples in theoretical physics, in which the properties of particles are used to group them into speculative taxonomies hinting at new physical laws. Sometimes this works and leads to an actual discovery, sometimes it doesn't, sometimes it can't work, sometimes it's still undecided.

I do not recognize this particular scheme (it appears to be the work of a group of researchers from Madagascar), but on closer inspection it could turn out to be a variation on something well-known. If anyone does want to get to the bottom of it, they could try this 2018 paper by the same people, in which it is described as based on a combination of "phase space symmetry" with the usual "internal symmetries" of gauge theory.
 
Thank you for answer.

Could you please elaborate a little more on the part where you said "on closer inspection it could turn out to be a variation on something well-known"

thank you again.
 
I might start by trying to understand their use of Clifford algebras, and their use of phase space symmetries. Then I could look for precedents in the literature.
 
mitchell porter said:
I might start by trying to understand their use of Clifford algebras, and their use of phase space symmetries. Then I could look for precedents in the literature.
I understand, Please let me know if you find anything in this direction. Thank you again. I remarked (from the picture) that they use the generators of the Clifford algebra to define some kind of ladder operators: I don't know if it is something usual or known.
 
Last edited:
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
I'm trying to understand the relationship between the Higgs mechanism and the concept of inertia. The Higgs field gives fundamental particles their rest mass, but it doesn't seem to directly explain why a massive object resists acceleration (inertia). My question is: How does the Standard Model account for inertia? Is it simply taken as a given property of mass, or is there a deeper connection to the vacuum structure? Furthermore, how does the Higgs mechanism relate to broader concepts like...

Similar threads

Back
Top