Classifying Symmetric Quadratic Forms

Bacle
Messages
656
Reaction score
1
Hi, All:

I am trying to see how to classify all symmetric bilinear forms B on R^3 as a V.Space
over the reals.

My idea is to use the standard basis for R^3 , then use the matrix representation M
=x^T.M.y . Then, since M is, by assumption, symmetric, we can diagonalize M.

So it seems all symmetric bilinear forms are just all diagonal matrices; maybe we
need to factor out those that are equivalent as bilinear forms, i.e., B,B' are equivalent
if there is a linear isomorphism L:R^3-->R^3 with B(v)=B'(L(v)).

Is this right? Is there anything else?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can even do better! You can even diagonalize those forms such that the diagonal matrix only has 1, -1 or 0 as diagonal entries!
A symmetric bilinear form with 0 as diagonal entry are exactly the non-degenerate forms.

All this actually follows from Gram-Schmidt orthogonalization.

See http://mathworld.wolfram.com/SymmetricBilinearForm.html
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
Back
Top