Cleaning up radioactive or mine waste

In summary: The subject is worthy of discussion in the wider Nuclear Engineering forum - perhaps you can start a new thread?In summary, this conversation is discussing the environmental consequences of mining rare earth elements. The participants are discussing ways to mitigate these consequences, with little hope of success.
  • #1
jadair1
44
0
I would hope it is not unsolvable but I know I will be dead long before this mess is cleaned up and I hope that it is resolved in my grandchildren's generation. They are in their twenties now and have children of their own.

All of us anti nuke people talk about solar power and other alternative energy sources but disregard the damage done to mine the rare Earth elements needed to build them.

I have no idea what the solution is but I know we are on a horrible path.

[Moderator note: Threads were spun off from the Japan Earthquake: nuclear plants part 2]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
jadair1 said:
All of us anti nuke people talk about solar power and other alternative energy sources but disregard the damage done to mine the rare Earth elements needed to build them.

(1) Typical PV panels don't use rare Earth elements. They use silicon. Rare Earth's go into small volume, very expensive and very efficient panels, mostly geared for spacecraft .

(2) Mining can be done different ways. If regulations are in place (e.g. air pollution, effluent control...) and enforced, mining is not significantly damaging.

I have no idea what the solution is but I know we are on a horrible path.

You like to feel scared and/or guilty?
 
  • #3
nikkkom said:
(1) Typical PV panels don't use rare Earth elements. They use silicon. Rare Earth's go into small volume, very expensive and very efficient panels, mostly geared for spacecraft .

(2) Mining can be done different ways. If regulations are in place (e.g. air pollution, effluent control...) and enforced, mining is not significantly damaging.
You like to feel scared and/or guilty?

I am neither scared nor feeling guilty. I died after having an operation for having cancerous tumors removed from my mouth in 2008, fortunately I was in the hospital at the time and they brought me back. Everything since then is bonus time!

I know a thing or two about rare Earth elements and their uses, years ago I was heavily invested in the mining sector, mainly gold and copper mines but I was looking to get into rare Earth projects in North and South America so I researched the field extensively.

Most of the rare Earth elements at the time came from China and it was of great concern to industry in the west as China was cutting back exports every year as their needs were increasing. Also for strategic reasons.

The amount that goes into space is miniscule compared to that used in terrestrial electronics. Now having said that I still oppose Nuclear Energy ever since Fukushima blew up and I was once a staunch supporter.

You are correct however that little REE are used in the construction of the panels but the associated electronics and controls would use them.

Here is an interesting link if you are interested. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rare_earth_element#Environmental_considerations
 
  • #4
jadair1 said:
You are correct however that little REE are used in the construction of the panels but the associated electronics and controls would use them.

Here is an interesting link if you are interested. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rare_earth_element#Environmental_considerations

I read it, and saw nothing unexpected there. It says the mining of REs produces mildly radioactive tailings with some thorium. This is not unique by a long shot. For example, mining of phosphates often produces uranium-enriched tailings. Because of this, there are environmental laws on mining, requiring mining company to treat its waste streams, rendering them safe.
 
  • #5
Did you not read how environmentally unsafe the mining practices in China are for the illegal mines and standards largely ignored by the larger ones. Never mind this is getting way to off topic for this forum.
 
  • #6
Actually, this is very much on topic.
The mining of rare Earth's, much like phosphate rock processing, mobilizes a large volume of radioactive residue material.
Nobody has any coherent way to deal with this and the price of the end product is too low to pay for reasonable remediation.
It sure reminds me of nuclear spent fuel and waste management, the cost of fixing it properly is daunting, so we ignore the problem, but eventually it forces itself onto center stage.
The Chinese let the market fix the problem by imposing an export quota, which hugely raised the price. That made a cleanup affordable. Although the suppliers probably find it cheaper to bribe the local officials than to remedy the situation, at least the economic prerequisites are now met.
A huge tax on uranium mining would probably do wonders for fuel reprocessing and nuclear waste management.
 
  • #7
Bandit127 said:
Sorry etudiant but I cannot see how this is on topic for a thread entitled "Japan Earthquake: nuclear plants".

The subject is worthy of discussion in the wider Nuclear Engineering forum - perhaps you can start a new thread?
You make a good point, although to all appearances the ongoing lower level radiation leakage from the Fukushima site is a major issue.
Cleaning up a large area of contamination is a missing skill in the nuclear world, as Fukushima among others illustrates, but better handled in a new thread as you suggest.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #8
jadair1 said:
Did you not read how environmentally unsafe the mining practices in China are for the illegal mines and standards largely ignored by the larger ones

This is not a problem of mining REs per se. It is a problem of Chinese people lacking ways to affect their government and improve their laws. Discussing *that* problem would be off-topic here.
 

1. How do you clean up radioactive or mine waste?

The process of cleaning up radioactive or mine waste involves several steps. First, the contaminated area must be identified and assessed to determine the extent of the contamination. Then, the waste must be safely contained and removed from the area. This can be done through techniques such as excavation or pumping. Next, the waste is typically treated and stabilized to make it less hazardous. Finally, the cleaned-up area is monitored to ensure that all contaminants have been properly removed.

2. Is it safe to clean up radioactive or mine waste?

Yes, it is safe to clean up radioactive or mine waste as long as proper precautions and safety measures are taken. These measures may include wearing protective gear, using specialized equipment, and following specific protocols for handling and disposing of the waste. It is important for trained professionals to oversee and carry out the cleanup process to minimize any potential risks.

3. How long does it take to clean up radioactive or mine waste?

The duration of the cleanup process depends on various factors such as the type and amount of waste, the size of the contaminated area, and the chosen cleanup method. In some cases, it can take several years to completely clean up a site. However, interim measures may be taken to reduce immediate risks while a long-term cleanup plan is developed and implemented.

4. What are the potential environmental impacts of cleaning up radioactive or mine waste?

The cleanup process itself may have some environmental impacts, such as disturbance of the land and emissions from equipment used. However, the overall goal of the cleanup is to reduce the environmental impacts of the waste itself. The potential risks and impacts of the waste can range from contamination of soil, water, and air to harm to human and wildlife health. Proper containment and treatment of the waste can help minimize these impacts.

5. Who is responsible for cleaning up radioactive or mine waste?

In most cases, the responsibility for cleaning up radioactive or mine waste falls on the entity that generated or owns the waste. This could be a mining company, a government agency, or a private property owner. However, in some cases, the responsibility may be shared among multiple parties, and the government may also play a role in overseeing and funding the cleanup process.

Similar threads

Replies
18
Views
10K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
4
Views
11K
  • Nuclear Engineering
22
Replies
763
Views
258K
Replies
14
Views
8K
Replies
32
Views
13K
Replies
64
Views
15K
  • General Discussion
2
Replies
47
Views
9K
  • General Discussion
2
Replies
42
Views
10K
  • General Discussion
3
Replies
78
Views
9K
Back
Top