The discussion revolves around a video showcasing clever geometry involving moving balls, with participants expressing their thoughts on the setup and execution of the movements. The scope includes conceptual reflections on the mechanics behind the video and the use of computer-generated imagery (CGI).
Participants do not reach a consensus on the nature of the video, with some believing in the possibility of a physical setup while others assert it is CGI. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of the video’s production method.
There are assumptions about the feasibility of the physical setup versus CGI, and the discussion reflects varying levels of familiarity with animation software and techniques.
I thought the same. I'd think you'd have to have the balls held by electromagnets that are then released sequentially. It seems virtually impossible to do this by hand. Having the channels made so precisely that the balls all move the same way must also be some computerized thing.FactChecker said:I'm not as impressed by how they are moving now as I am that the balls were initially set up perfectly.
Now I feel like a caveman confused by fire. A lot of the animated Youtube videos have fooled me recently. They have become incredibly realistic. This one is clearly identified as animated using Blender in the Youtube description. I wish that Youtube had a policy that the title indicate CGI.DaveC426913 said:Guys, it's CGI. These kinds of Marble Madness videos are all over the innertoobs.