Clinical Medical Physics in a Field Other than Radiotherapy

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the potential for pursuing a career in clinical medical physics outside of traditional radiotherapy, specifically focusing on fields such as photomedicine and molecular imaging. Participants explore the feasibility of specializing in these areas within graduate programs and the job market implications.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses interest in specializing in photomedicine or molecular imaging due to a strong background in optics and questions the availability of clinical positions outside radiation oncology.
  • Another participant notes that while most clinical medical physics work is focused on radiation therapy, there are emerging opportunities in molecular imaging and optics, though these positions are less common.
  • A participant inquires about the possibility of engaging in clinical work in radiation therapy while simultaneously pursuing research in imaging or optics, questioning the relationship between clinical duties and research interests.
  • It is suggested that medical physicists often have the flexibility to pursue diverse research projects, provided they fulfill their clinical responsibilities, although branching into non-clinical areas may require additional resources.
  • A specific program at UCLA is mentioned as having a strong molecular imaging track, highlighting an example of a graduate program that supports this specialization.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that while opportunities in molecular imaging and optics exist, they are not as prevalent as those in radiation therapy. However, there is no consensus on the feasibility of balancing clinical work with unrelated research, as opinions vary on the flexibility of medical physicists in pursuing diverse research interests.

Contextual Notes

The discussion reflects varying levels of demand for clinical physicists in different specialties and the potential challenges associated with pursuing research outside traditional clinical roles. There are indications of dependence on institutional resources and funding for non-clinical research projects.

akol369
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello.

I am currently considering doing my graduate work in the field of medical physics. Most of the programs I'm looking at have specialties in either radiotherapy or medical imaging. As I have a strong background in optics I would like to pursue if possible photomedicine or molecular imaging. If I find a program that would let me specialize in these fields would I be able to find work in a hospital as a clinical physicist that does not deal with radiation oncology directly?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The vast majority of clinical medical physics work is related to radiation therapy and most of the accredited graduate programs that I'm aware of have a heavy concentration on topics related to radiation therapy.

That being said, there is a lot of interesting work being doing in the fields of molecular imaging and optics these days. I know (or have known) a few graduate students and working medical physicists who have projects in these fields. The problem is that the routine clinical demand for such physicists isn't as strong as it is in radiation therapy. There are clinical positions in nuclear medicine departments and MRI-support physicists, but just not as many as the more "conventional" radiotherapy positions.
 
Thanks for the response! One more question. If that is the case, then would it be possible to do clinical work in radiation therapy while doing a research project in imaging or optics on the side? I read that many medical physicists aren't tied down to one job, but am now wondering if research and clinical work should be related directly or if there is room to breathe a little.
 
Yes.

The research the medical physicsts do can vary considerably. Naturally, a lot of the research is directly related to their clinical work, and it's not difficult to see why this is. To branch out into a "non-clinical" area usually requires significant outside funding and equipment, whereas for projects directly related to radiation therapy you already have much of the equipment you need at your disposal, provided you are willing to stay late on a few nights.

There is however no rule that dictates "thall shalt perform research in field X." My experience is that as long as I get my clinical duties done, I'm basically free to pursue whatever research projects capture my interest, so long as I'm being reasonably productive.
 
The CAMPEP accredited Biomedical Physics program at UCLA has a great molecular imaging track. They have an entire institute (Crump institute) dedicated to molecular imaging, and all the powerhouses (and inventor) of PET still are around.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K