Clopen Sets: Closure = Interior?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter blahblah8724
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    closure Interior Sets
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
9 replies · 3K views
blahblah8724
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
For a subset which is both closed and open (clopen) does its closure equal its interior?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
But one of the questions in my example sheet said think of an example of a disconnected subspace T of a topological space S for which there are no nonempty subsets A,B of T such that [itex]A\cup B = T[/itex] but [itex]\bar{A} \cap \bar{B} =[/itex]∅

Surely if [itex]\bar{A} = A = A^o[/itex] then [itex]\bar{A} \cap \bar{B} = A \cap B = ∅[/itex] which is the definition of disconnected so there are no examples?
 
Do you mean larger than T?
 
But how could you possibly go about proving that there are NO nonempty subsets
 
It helps if you have the actual example that you're going to work with. As you've observed this phenomenon is atypical behavior of disconnected spaces, so you really need to exploit the fact that you're working in a larger topology.

Think a bit about the example I gave with A... can you think of a disconnected subset T in R such that when you take the closure of its two separated halves, they intersect (hint: this is the same as just taking the closure of T)
 
How about the subset (0,2) where the two halves are (0,1) and (1,2)? So the closure would be [0,1] and [1,2] which intersect at 1?
 
Surely the union of those two halves don't make the entire space as they miss out the point 1?