Close it or discuss it? a counter rotating earth core

  • Thread starter Thread starter Andre
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the decision to close a thread about a counter-rotating Earth core, with participants debating the importance of educational dialogue versus adherence to forum rules. One contributor expresses concern for a young, inquisitive individual who might be discouraged by the thread's closure, emphasizing the value of exploring unconventional ideas. However, others argue that the forum's purpose is not to entertain every wild theory, as it could lead to misinformation. The closing decision was influenced by the original poster's dismissal of established rules, highlighting the tension between fostering creativity and maintaining order. Ultimately, the conversation reflects the challenge of balancing open discussion with the integrity of the forum's guidelines.
Andre
Messages
4,310
Reaction score
73
Of course the decision to close this thread was absolutely correct, no doubt about it.

My first thought when I saw it, was to report it let nature take its course. But I was also thinking about that eight year old asperger-diagnosed super-IQ kid that I know, who would ask questions like that. Therefore I just attempted to explain the problems with ideas like that and steer him into the right direction.

I know, it's a conflict but education is the primary objective and I felt that this kid of mine would be very hurt with closing his thread.

Thoughts?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It was the following statement by the OP in response to other members trying to remind him of the rules that sealed the case for the lock (at least for me):

budapest said:
"If we dismiss theories because they seem weird, we risk missing true breakthroughs." Max Tegmark, MIT physicist

This is exactly the place where we should discuss wild ideas - new ideas - interesting ideas.

That is not how the PF works.
 
I want to thank those members who interacted with me a couple of years ago in two Optics Forum threads. They were @Drakkith, @hutchphd, @Gleb1964, and @KAHR-Alpha. I had something I wanted the scientific community to know and slipped a new idea in against the rules. Thank you also to @berkeman for suggesting paths to meet with academia. Anyway, I finally got a paper on the same matter as discussed in those forum threads, the fat lens model, got it peer-reviewed, and IJRAP...
About 20 years ago, in my mid-30s (and with a BA in economics and a master's in business), I started taking night classes in physics hoping to eventually earn the science degree I'd always wanted but never pursued. I found physics forums and used it to ask questions I was unable to get answered from my textbooks or class lectures. Unfortunately, work and life got in the way and I never got further the freshman courses. Well, here it is 20 years later. I'm in my mid-50s now, and in a...

Similar threads

Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
33
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top