What is the densest space-filling polyhedra lattice structure?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Eppur si muove
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lattice
AI Thread Summary
The densest space-filling polyhedra lattice structure is identified as cubic close packing (face-centered cubic, FCC) or hexagonal close packing (HCP), both achieving similar density efficiencies. While cubic packing is often considered, there is no definitive proof that it is the absolute best arrangement, leaving it an open problem in geometry. The estimated maximum packing efficiency is around 74%, with theoretical upper bounds suggesting it could be as high as 80%. The FCC and HCP structures are equivalent when viewed through specific planes, confirming their density. The discussion highlights the complexities and ongoing inquiries into lattice structures in geometry.
Eppur si muove
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
What is the densiest space-filling polyhedra lattice?My first guess would be the cubic one, but i am not sure.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I think it would be hexagonal close packed (tetrahedral).
 
Can one prove that it is tetrahedral and possibly find the dimensions that would give the maximum density?
 
Yes, you can calculate the density for the various lattices and compare them. It's a fun geometry problem!
 
i believe it's called "cubic closest" packing, that is the best around. there is no proof that that is in fact, the best arrangement. this is an open problem. i forget what the effiiciency is, let's say, arbitrarily, it's 74% (i think that's close). it has been proven that (again, this is completely arbitrary, made up by me from loose memory) 80% is the best one can do. then again, something like 79.4% efficiency. the upper bounds are closing in, but as of yet, no proof.

EDIT: I"m a moron. nowhere did you ask about spheres. i replied about spheres. I will leave this anyways.
 
The cubic close packing (or face centered cubic lattice) is the same as the hexagonal close packed (abab) structure...and is the densest 3D lattice structure. To see that the FCC is the same as the HCP, simply look at a set of parallel {111} planes in the FCC.

Trancefishy : You're not a moron. When the structure of a lattice "point" is unmentioned, it's more than reasonable to assume it is spherical.

Additional Note : There are two kinds of symmetric hexagonal close packed structures : "abab" and "abcabc". Both are equally dense, but only the abab structure is the same as the FCC.
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top