Closed trajectories in phase space

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on proving that a given trajectory in phase space is closed, specifically for a one-dimensional system with the energy equation E=\frac{1}{2}\dot{x}^2 +\frac{1}{2}x^2 + \frac{\epsilon}{4}x^4. The participant demonstrates that plotting various trajectories indicates they are closed but seeks a formal proof. They suggest using Hamilton equations to derive the equations of motion p(t) and x(t) to confirm closed orbits, while expressing a desire for a more elementary proof without relying on Hamiltonian formalism.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of phase space concepts
  • Familiarity with energy equations in classical mechanics
  • Basic knowledge of Hamiltonian mechanics
  • Ability to interpret differential equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Hamiltonian mechanics and its applications in classical mechanics
  • Learn about closed trajectories in phase space and their significance
  • Explore methods for proving closed orbits in dynamical systems
  • Investigate the implications of energy conservation in phase space
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, particularly those studying classical mechanics, and researchers interested in dynamical systems and phase space analysis.

ralqs
Messages
97
Reaction score
1
In general, how do you prove that a given trajectory in phase space is closed?

For example, suppose the energy E of a one-dimensional system is given by E=\frac{1}{2}\dot{x}^2 +\frac{1}{2}x^2 + \frac{\epsilon}{4}x^4, where ε is a positive constant. Now, I can easily show that all phase trajectories, regardless of energy, are closed by just plotting the various trajectories. But how do I prove it?

I can show that for any (positive) value of E, there's a value of x such that dx/dt is zero. But does this *prove* that the phase trajectories are closed? If it does, I don't see how.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You could always just use the Hamilton equations to solve for the equations of motion p(t) and x(t) and then solve them for each other to get something like p(x) and show that this results in closed orbits.

Are you asking for a simpler way to do it?
 
Matterwave said:
Are you asking for a simpler way to do it?

Yes. Especially because I haven't yet learned the Hamiltonian formalism. I would think that there's a more or less elementary way to show \dot{x}^2 + x^2 + \frac{\epsilon}{2}x^4 =\mathrm{constant} closes on itself, but try as I might I can't come up with anything...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
22K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K