Cmos imaging sensor response

In summary, the conversation discusses the response of a CMOS imaging sensor and whether the sensor's response would remain constant when measurements are taken with variable irradiances and exposure times as long as the total exposure remains constant. It is mentioned that an ideal sensor measures the accumulated number of photons and that real sensors may have a dark current and leakage. It is also noted that the conversion of charge to digital number may not be linear, but most devices are run in a region where they are linear and have a programmable gain stage for calibration. The heart of the question is the charge-to-digital number conversion.
  • #1
nbo10
418
5
Hi all,
I have a question about the response of a cmos imaging sensor. The total exposure is defined as the irradiance * pixel area * exposure time and it can be varied by changing either the irradiance or the exposure time. Would the sensor response remain constant if measurements are taken with variable irradiances and exposure times under the condition that the total exposure is constant?

My naive thinking would assume that the sensor would measure the same value at constant total exposure independent of the irradiance and exposure time values. Or are there other details, particular the circuit used convert charge to a digital number, that effect the sensor value? Thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
nbo10 said:
My naive thinking would assume that the sensor would measure the same value at constant total exposure independent of the irradiance and exposure time values.
An ideal sensor measures the accumalated number of photons - it doesn't care about the rate they arrived.
In practice real sensors have a dark current, as signal that builds up with time even without light, and a leakage where very low level signals may be lost
 
  • #3
NobodySpecial said:
An ideal sensor measures the accumalated number of photons - t

Well this is wrong. Photons are not accumulated. There is a photon to charge conversion and charge carrier is accumulated. Now, the conversion of photons to change is linear but the conversion of charge to digital number might not be linear. The charge-to-digital number conversion is the heart of my question.
 
  • #4
nbo10 said:
Well this is wrong. Photons are not accumulated.
Didn't say they were - I said it measured the number of photons accumulated - as opposed to measuring their rate as a photocell or photocathode might.

conversion of charge to digital number might not be linear.
The charge to voltage on the pixel unit cell is inherently not linear for a CMOS sensor - as opposed to a CCD where it almost is. But most real devices, especially consumer units, are run in a region where they are pretty linear.

The charge-to-digital number conversion is the heart of my question.
The per pixel charge->voltage conversion and the output amp are generally pretty much linear - it's too hard to do calibration otherwise.
You could make the output amp->ADC non-linear to match the response of photographic film or of an older tube TV camera but most don't.
The normal way is just ot have a programmable gain stage and switch in a different linear multiplication before the ADC.
 

1. How does a CMOS imaging sensor work?

A CMOS (complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor) imaging sensor is made up of millions of tiny light-sensitive cells, called pixels, that convert light into electrical signals. These signals are then processed and transformed into a digital image by the camera's processor.

2. What is the response time of a CMOS imaging sensor?

The response time of a CMOS imaging sensor refers to the amount of time it takes for the sensor to convert light into electrical signals and process them into a digital image. This can vary depending on the camera's settings and the amount of light present, but is generally very fast.

3. Can a CMOS imaging sensor capture high-quality images in low light conditions?

Yes, CMOS imaging sensors are designed to be highly sensitive to light, allowing them to capture clear and detailed images even in low light conditions. However, the quality of the image may still be affected by the camera's settings and the amount of light available.

4. How does the size of a CMOS imaging sensor affect image quality?

The size of a CMOS imaging sensor can have a significant impact on the quality of the resulting image. Generally, larger sensors are able to capture more light and produce higher quality images with less noise. However, smaller sensors can also produce high-quality images with the right settings and lighting conditions.

5. What are the advantages of using a CMOS imaging sensor over other types of sensors?

CMOS imaging sensors have several advantages over other types of sensors, including lower power consumption, faster readout speeds, and the ability to capture high-quality images in low light conditions. They are also more cost-effective to produce, making them a popular choice for digital cameras and other imaging devices.

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
7
Views
392
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
7
Replies
226
Views
11K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Materials and Chemical Engineering
Replies
12
Views
527
  • Programming and Computer Science
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
152
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top