Cockroaches are immune to the effects of radiation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter The_Absolute
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Effects Radiation
AI Thread Summary
Roaches are not immune to radiation; rather, their slower cell division rates contribute to their resilience. The discussion highlights that during cell division, cells are more susceptible to radiation damage. Since human cells divide more frequently, they face a higher risk of radiation effects compared to roaches, which may explain why a colony can endure radiation levels that would be lethal to humans. The key factor is the timing of cell division, with roaches experiencing longer intervals between divisions, reducing their vulnerability to radiation exposure.
The_Absolute
Messages
174
Reaction score
0
I've always heard people say that roaches and similar insects are completely immune to the dangerous effects that radiation has on biological organisms. Although I doubt this is true, I just wanted someone on this forum with the scientific expertise to confirm this.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Roaches aren't immune, their cells divide slower, so there's less chances of radiation causing problems.

So a colony of roaches may survive where humans wouldn't, but every roach wouldn't necissarily survive
 
Fortifiv2 said:
What does speed at which it's cell's divide have to do with its chances of radiation having an effect on it?

It's not the speed they divide, it's the interval between dividing. From what I understand, during cell division is when cells are most vulnerable to radiation. Humans cells are constantly dividing.
 
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...
Back
Top