Coding Theory. It also combine some linear algebra as well.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a coding theory problem that involves understanding hints provided in a textbook. Participants suggest using the definition of a perfect bound from page 97 to demonstrate an equality for the first question. For the second question, it is necessary to prove that correcting three errors in a code of length 15 does not satisfy the Hamming bound. Evaluating the relevant formula with the specified parameters is essential to show this. Clarification on these points is crucial for solving the coding theory problems presented.
hky
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi Guys

I just got some problem about coding theory and I don't quite understand what question 2 is asking.

Can you guys help me?

Thanks a lot.
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
Hey hky and welcome to the forums.

These questions provide hints in various sections: can you tell us what those hints correspond to?
 
hello,can someone give me a hand? Please.
 
For the first one, you should use the definition of a perfect bound that is given on page 97 and this can be plugged in directly to show the equality holds.

For the second one, you will need to show that the equality is not possible for the given length (of 15) to correct the number of errors (3). So you will have to evaluate the formula for these parameters and show that it does not meet the Hamming bound.
 
I was reading a Bachelor thesis on Peano Arithmetic (PA). PA has the following axioms (not including the induction schema): $$\begin{align} & (A1) ~~~~ \forall x \neg (x + 1 = 0) \nonumber \\ & (A2) ~~~~ \forall xy (x + 1 =y + 1 \to x = y) \nonumber \\ & (A3) ~~~~ \forall x (x + 0 = x) \nonumber \\ & (A4) ~~~~ \forall xy (x + (y +1) = (x + y ) + 1) \nonumber \\ & (A5) ~~~~ \forall x (x \cdot 0 = 0) \nonumber \\ & (A6) ~~~~ \forall xy (x \cdot (y + 1) = (x \cdot y) + x) \nonumber...

Similar threads

Back
Top